Literature DB >> 21255123

What subcortical-cortical relationships tell us about processing speech in noise.

Alexandra Parbery-Clark1, Frederic Marmel, Julia Bair, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

To advance our understanding of the biological basis of speech-in-noise perception, we investigated the effects of background noise on both subcortical- and cortical-evoked responses, and the relationships between them, in normal hearing young adults. The addition of background noise modulated subcortical and cortical response morphology. In noise, subcortical responses were later, smaller in amplitude and demonstrated decreased neural precision in encoding the speech sound. Cortical responses were also delayed by noise, yet the amplitudes of the major peaks (N1, P2) were affected differently, with N1 increasing and P2 decreasing. Relationships between neural measures and speech-in-noise ability were identified, with earlier subcortical responses, higher subcortical response fidelity and greater cortical N1 response magnitude all relating to better speech-in-noise perception. Furthermore, it was only with the addition of background noise that relationships between subcortical and cortical encoding of speech and the behavioral measures of speech in noise emerged. Results illustrate that human brainstem responses and N1 cortical response amplitude reflect coordinated processes with regards to the perception of speech in noise, thereby acting as a functional index of speech-in-noise perception.
© 2011 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2011 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21255123     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07546.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  33 in total

1.  Why middle-aged listeners have trouble hearing in everyday settings.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Predicting perception in noise using cortical auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Garnett P McMillan; Tina M Penman; Sun Mi Gille
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-13

3.  Inherent auditory skills rather than formal music training shape the neural encoding of speech.

Authors:  Kelsey Mankel; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Brainstem Evoked Potential Indices of Subcortical Auditory Processing After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Kathy R Vander Werff; Brian Rieger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Travis White-Schwoch; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The effects of short-term computerized speech-in-noise training on postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Erin M Ingvalson; Brienne Lee; Pamela Fiebig; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Noise-induced enhancement of envelope following responses in normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Samuel Y Gordon; Garnett P McMillan; Frederick J Gallun; Michelle R Molis; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  A perspective on brain-behavior relationships and effects of age and hearing using speech-in-noise stimuli.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Brandon M Madsen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  The neural processing of masked speech.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.