Literature DB >> 11293781

Continuous versus categorical data for ROC analysis: some quantitative considerations.

R F Wagner1, S V Beiden, C E Metz.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Several authors have encouraged the use of a quasi-continuous rating scale for data collection in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of diagnostic modalities, rather than rating scales based on five to seven ordinal categories or levels of suspicion. Although many investigators have gone over to this method, a discussion of the issues continues. The present work provides a quantitative analysis from the viewpoint of measurement science.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A simple model of the effect of data discretization or quantization on the measurement of the variance of noisy data was developed. Then Monte Carlo simulations of multiple-reader, multiple-case ROC experiments were performed and analyzed in terms of components-of-variance models to investigate the effect of data quantization in that more complex setting.
RESULTS: For single-reader studies, discretization into five categories can reduce the precision of ROC measurements by a large amount. The effect may be attenuated in multireader studies.
CONCLUSION: More precise measurements of diagnostic detection performance and thus more efficient use of resources are served by good measurement methods. These are promoted by the use of a quasi-continuous rating scale in ROC studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11293781     DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80502-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  17 in total

1.  A nonparametric procedure for comparing the areas under correlated LROC curves.

Authors:  Adam Wunderlich; Frédéric Noo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 2.  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-10-27

3.  Quasi-continuous and discrete confidence rating scales for observer performance studies: Effects on ROC analysis.

Authors:  Lubomir Hadjiiski; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Selection of a rating scale in receiver operating characteristic studies: some remaining issues.

Authors:  Howard E Rockette; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  A scaling transformation for classifier output based on likelihood ratio: applications to a CAD workstation for diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Karla Horsch; Lorenzo L Pesce; Maryellen L Giger; Charles E Metz; Yulei Jiang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Generalized Roe and Metz receiver operating characteristic model: analytic link between simulated decision scores and empirical AUC variances and covariances.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-09-25

7.  Verification of modified receiver-operating characteristic software using simulated rating data.

Authors:  Junji Shiraishi; Daisuke Fukuoka; Reimi Iha; Haruka Inada; Rie Tanaka; Takeshi Hara
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-09-22

8.  Semiparametric estimation of the relationship between ROC operating points and the test-result scale: application to the proper binormal model.

Authors:  Lorenzo L Pesce; Karla Horsch; Karen Drukker; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Multivariate normally distributed biomarkers subject to limits of detection and receiver operating characteristic curve inference.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 10.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: practical review for radiologists.

Authors:  Seong Ho Park; Jin Mo Goo; Chan-Hee Jo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.