Literature DB >> 22723469

Comparison of nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs for influenza detection in adults.

Stephanie A Irving1, Mary F Vandermause, David K Shay, Edward A Belongia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Examine differences in the detection of influenza by specimen and test type using paired nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs.
DESIGN: Prospective study
SETTING: Enrollment took place between January and March 2007 in a central Wisconsin population. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients were screened and enrolled by trained research coordinators following medical encounters for acute respiratory illnesses of <10 days duration.
METHODS: Paired nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from consenting patients and tested by both real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) and viral culture. A composite measure of positivity was used as the gold standard; cases included any positive result by rRT-PCR or viral culture from either specimen type.
RESULTS: Paired samples were collected from 240 adults; 33 (14%) individuals tested positive for influenza by rRT-PCR. Using rRT-PCR, the sensitivity of the nasal swab was 89% (95% CI, 78%-99%) and the sensitivity of the nasopharyngeal swab was 94% (95% CI, 87%-100%), compared to a composite gold standard.
CONCLUSION: Test sensitivity did not vary significantly by swab type when using a highly sensitive molecular diagnostic test, but power was limited to detect modest differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22723469      PMCID: PMC3494547          DOI: 10.3121/cmr.2012.1084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med Res        ISSN: 1539-4182


  13 in total

1.  Comparative study of nasopharyngeal aspirate and nasal swab specimens for detection of influenza.

Authors:  T Heikkinen; A A Salmi; O Ruuskanen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-20

2.  Prospective comparative study of culture specimens and methods in diagnosing influenza in adults.

Authors:  M L Schmid; G Kudesia; S Wake; R C Read
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-24

3.  Nasal swab versus nasopharyngeal aspirate for isolation of respiratory viruses.

Authors:  Terho Heikkinen; Jane Marttila; Aimo A Salmi; Olli Ruuskanen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the Quidel QuickVue test for detection of influenza A and B viruses in the pediatric emergency medicine setting by use of three specimen collection methods.

Authors:  Konstantinos Agoritsas; Kathy Mack; Bema K Bonsu; Debbie Goodman; Douglas Salamon; Mario J Marcon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Mortality due to influenza in the United States--an annualized regression approach using multiple-cause mortality data.

Authors:  Jonathan Dushoff; Joshua B Plotkin; Cecile Viboud; David J D Earn; Lone Simonsen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccines varied substantially with antigenic match from the 2004-2005 season to the 2006-2007 season.

Authors:  Edward A Belongia; Burney A Kieke; James G Donahue; Robert T Greenlee; Amanda Balish; Angie Foust; Stephen Lindstrom; David K Shay
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Comparing nose-throat swabs and nasopharyngeal aspirates collected from children with symptoms for respiratory virus identification using real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Stephen B Lambert; David M Whiley; Nicholas T O'Neill; Emily C Andrews; Fiona M Canavan; Cheryl Bletchly; David J Siebert; Theo P Sloots; Michael D Nissen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Identification of respiratory viruses in adults: nasopharyngeal versus oropharyngeal sampling.

Authors:  David Lieberman; Devora Lieberman; Avi Shimoni; Ayelet Keren-Naus; Rachel Steinberg; Yonat Shemer-Avni
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic.

Authors:  Neil M Ferguson; Derek A T Cummings; Christophe Fraser; James C Cajka; Philip C Cooley; Donald S Burke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Estimates of US influenza-associated deaths made using four different methods.

Authors:  William W Thompson; Eric Weintraub; Praveen Dhankhar; Po-Yung Cheng; Lynnette Brammer; Martin I Meltzer; Joseph S Bresee; David K Shay
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.380

View more
  28 in total

1.  Equivalence of influenza A virus RNA recovery from nasal swabs when lysing the swab and storage medium versus storage medium alone.

Authors:  Maya Nadimpalli; Nora Pisanic; Christopher D Heaney; Jill Stewart
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.014

2.  Detection of influenza by real time RT-PCR is not affected by delays in respiratory specimen processing.

Authors:  Ryan Dare; Yuwei Zhu; John V Williams; Marie Griffin; H Keipp Talbot
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.327

3.  Comparison of Respiratory Specimen Collection Methods for Detection of Influenza Virus Infection by Reverse Transcription-PCR: a Literature Review.

Authors:  Sarah Spencer; Mark G Thompson; Brendan Flannery; Alicia Fry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Effects of imperfect test sensitivity and specificity on observational studies of influenza vaccine effectiveness.

Authors:  Michael L Jackson; Kenneth J Rothman
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Incorporating Real-time Influenza Detection Into the Test-negative Design for Estimating Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness: The Real-time Test-negative Design (rtTND).

Authors:  Leora R Feldstein; Wesley H Self; Jill M Ferdinands; Adrienne G Randolph; Michael Aboodi; Adrienne H Baughman; Samuel M Brown; Matthew C Exline; D Clark Files; Kevin Gibbs; Adit A Ginde; Michelle N Gong; Carlos G Grijalva; Natasha Halasa; Akram Khan; Christopher J Lindsell; Margaret Newhams; Ithan D Peltan; Matthew E Prekker; Todd W Rice; Nathan I Shapiro; Jay Steingrub; H Keipp Talbot; M Elizabeth Halloran; Manish Patel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Accessioning and automation compatible anterior nares swab design.

Authors:  Mary E Pettit; Sarah A Boswell; Jason Qian; Richard Novak; Michael Springer
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.014

7.  Surveillance of Acute Respiratory Infections Using Community-Submitted Symptoms and Specimens for Molecular Diagnostic Testing.

Authors:  Jennifer Goff; Aaron Rowe; John S Brownstein; Rumi Chunara
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2015-05-27

8.  Self-Collected Nasal Swabs for Respiratory Virus Surveillance.

Authors:  Michael L Jackson; Matthew Nguyen; Beth Kirlin; Lawrence Madziwa
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 3.835

9.  Relative sensitivity of anterior nares and nasopharyngeal swabs for initial detection of SARS-CoV-2 in ambulatory patients: Rapid review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yaolin Zhou; Timothy J O'Leary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Analytical Performance of COVID-19 Detection Methods (RT-PCR): Scientific and Societal Concerns.

Authors:  Roberto Verna; Walter Alallon; Masami Murakami; Catherine P M Hayward; Abdel Halim Harrath; Saleh H Alwasel; Nairo M Sumita; Ozkan Alatas; Valeria Fedeli; Praveen Sharma; Andrea Fuso; Daniela Maria Capuano; Maria Capalbo; Antonio Angeloni; Mariano Bizzarri
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.