OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to calculate sensitivity values for the detection of major respiratory viruses of childhood by using combined nose-throat swabs and nasopharyngeal aspirates. METHODS: Children who had symptoms and presented to a pediatric teaching hospital and had a diagnostic respiratory specimen collected were enrolled, and paired nose-throat swab and nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens were collected. Parents were asked to collect the nose-throat swab specimen in the first instance but could defer to a health care worker if unwilling. Nose-throat swab collectors were asked to rate perceived quality of collection. All nasopharyngeal aspirates were collected by a health care worker by using a standard protocol. Real-time polymerase chain reaction for 8 respiratory viruses was performed in our hospital's diagnostic laboratory. RESULTS: Paired nose-throat swab/nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens were collected during 303 illnesses, with at least 1 respiratory virus identified in 186 (61%). For the major pathogens of childhood, influenza A virus and respiratory syncytial virus, collection by using the nose-throat swab had a sensitivity of 91.9% and 93.1%, respectively. A health care worker collected 219 (72%) of the nose-throat swab specimens; concordance with the nasopharyngeal aspirate was not related to health care worker collection or perceived quality of collection. CONCLUSIONS: Nose-throat swab specimens, in combination with sensitive molecular testing, are a less invasive diagnostic respiratory specimen with adequate sensitivity for use in the clinic and hospital outpatient settings and large-scale community studies through parent collection. For children who present to a hospital in which an avian or pandemic strain of influenza virus is reasonably part of the differential diagnosis, nasopharyngeal aspirates or a similar collection technique (eg, nasal washes) should continue to be used.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to calculate sensitivity values for the detection of major respiratory viruses of childhood by using combined nose-throat swabs and nasopharyngeal aspirates. METHODS:Children who had symptoms and presented to a pediatric teaching hospital and had a diagnostic respiratory specimen collected were enrolled, and paired nose-throat swab and nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens were collected. Parents were asked to collect the nose-throat swab specimen in the first instance but could defer to a health care worker if unwilling. Nose-throat swab collectors were asked to rate perceived quality of collection. All nasopharyngeal aspirates were collected by a health care worker by using a standard protocol. Real-time polymerase chain reaction for 8 respiratory viruses was performed in our hospital's diagnostic laboratory. RESULTS: Paired nose-throat swab/nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens were collected during 303 illnesses, with at least 1 respiratory virus identified in 186 (61%). For the major pathogens of childhood, influenza A virus and respiratory syncytial virus, collection by using the nose-throat swab had a sensitivity of 91.9% and 93.1%, respectively. A health care worker collected 219 (72%) of the nose-throat swab specimens; concordance with the nasopharyngeal aspirate was not related to health care worker collection or perceived quality of collection. CONCLUSIONS: Nose-throat swab specimens, in combination with sensitive molecular testing, are a less invasive diagnostic respiratory specimen with adequate sensitivity for use in the clinic and hospital outpatient settings and large-scale community studies through parent collection. For children who present to a hospital in which an avian or pandemic strain of influenza virus is reasonably part of the differential diagnosis, nasopharyngeal aspirates or a similar collection technique (eg, nasal washes) should continue to be used.
Authors: Timothy M Uyeki; Henry H Bernstein; John S Bradley; Janet A Englund; Thomas M File; Alicia M Fry; Stefan Gravenstein; Frederick G Hayden; Scott A Harper; Jon Mark Hirshon; Michael G Ison; B Lynn Johnston; Shandra L Knight; Allison McGeer; Laura E Riley; Cameron R Wolfe; Paul E Alexander; Andrew T Pavia Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Angela P Campbell; Jane Kuypers; Janet A Englund; Katherine A Guthrie; Lawrence Corey; Michael Boeckh Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Timothy F Murphy; Tasnee Chonmaitree; Stephen Barenkamp; Jennelle Kyd; Johanna Nokso-Koivisto; Janak A Patel; Terho Heikkinen; Noboru Yamanaka; Pearay Ogra; W Edward Swords; Tania Sih; Melinda M Pettigrew Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Dennis K M Ip; Lincoln L H Lau; Kwok-Hung Chan; Vicky J Fang; Gabriel M Leung; Malik J S Peiris; Benjamin J Cowling Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Aimee K Zaas; Minhua Chen; Jay Varkey; Timothy Veldman; Alfred O Hero; Joseph Lucas; Yongsheng Huang; Ronald Turner; Anthony Gilbert; Robert Lambkin-Williams; N Christine Øien; Bradly Nicholson; Stephen Kingsmore; Lawrence Carin; Christopher W Woods; Geoffrey S Ginsburg Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2009-08-06 Impact factor: 21.023
Authors: T J Meerhoff; M L Houben; F E J Coenjaerts; J L L Kimpen; R W Hofland; F Schellevis; L J Bont Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2010-01-29 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Scott A Harper; John S Bradley; Janet A Englund; Thomas M File; Stefan Gravenstein; Frederick G Hayden; Allison J McGeer; Kathleen M Neuzil; Andrew T Pavia; Michael L Tapper; Timothy M Uyeki; Richard K Zimmerman Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 9.079