BACKGROUND: We estimated the effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccines for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed, medically attended influenza during 3 seasons with variable antigenic match between vaccine and patient strains. METHODS: Patients were enrolled during or after a clinical encounter for acute respiratory illness. Influenza infection was confirmed by culture or reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Case-control analyses were performed that used data from patients who were ill without influenza (hereafter, "test-negative control subjects") and data from asymptomatic control subjects from the population (hereafter, "traditional control subjects"). Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated as [100 x (1-adjusted odds ratio)]. Influenza isolates were antigenically characterized. RESULTS: Influenza was detected in 167 (20%) of 818 patients in 2004-2005, in 51 (14%) of 356 in 2005-2006, and in 102 (11%) of 932 in 2006-2007. Analyses that used data from test-negative control subjects showed that VE was 10% (95% confidence interval [CI], -36% to 40%) in 2004-2005, 21% (95% CI, -52% to 59%) in 2005-2006, and 52% (95% CI, 22% to 70%) in 2006-2007. Using data from traditional control subjects, VE for those seasons was estimated to be 5% (95% CI, -52% to 40%), 11% (95% CI, -96% to 59%), and 37% (95% CI, -10% to 64%), respectively; confidence intervals included 0. The percentage of viruses that were antigenically matched to vaccine strains was 5% (3 of 62) in 2004-2005, 5% (2 of 42) in 2005-2006, and 91% (85 of 93) in 2006-2007. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza VE varied substantially across 3 seasons and was highest when antigenic match was optimal. VE estimates that used data from test-negative control subjects were consistently higher than those that used data from traditional control subjects.
BACKGROUND: We estimated the effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccines for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed, medically attended influenza during 3 seasons with variable antigenic match between vaccine and patient strains. METHODS:Patients were enrolled during or after a clinical encounter for acute respiratory illness. Influenza infection was confirmed by culture or reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Case-control analyses were performed that used data from patients who were ill without influenza (hereafter, "test-negative control subjects") and data from asymptomatic control subjects from the population (hereafter, "traditional control subjects"). Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated as [100 x (1-adjusted odds ratio)]. Influenza isolates were antigenically characterized. RESULTS: Influenza was detected in 167 (20%) of 818 patients in 2004-2005, in 51 (14%) of 356 in 2005-2006, and in 102 (11%) of 932 in 2006-2007. Analyses that used data from test-negative control subjects showed that VE was 10% (95% confidence interval [CI], -36% to 40%) in 2004-2005, 21% (95% CI, -52% to 59%) in 2005-2006, and 52% (95% CI, 22% to 70%) in 2006-2007. Using data from traditional control subjects, VE for those seasons was estimated to be 5% (95% CI, -52% to 40%), 11% (95% CI, -96% to 59%), and 37% (95% CI, -10% to 64%), respectively; confidence intervals included 0. The percentage of viruses that were antigenically matched to vaccine strains was 5% (3 of 62) in 2004-2005, 5% (2 of 42) in 2005-2006, and 91% (85 of 93) in 2006-2007. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza VE varied substantially across 3 seasons and was highest when antigenic match was optimal. VE estimates that used data from test-negative control subjects were consistently higher than those that used data from traditional control subjects.
Authors: Michael L Jackson; Lisa A Jackson; Burney Kieke; David McClure; Manjusha Gaglani; Kempapura Murthy; Ryan Malosh; Arnold Monto; Richard K Zimmerman; Ivo M Foppa; Brendan Flannery; Mark G Thompson Journal: Vaccine Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Sarah Spencer; Manjusha Gaglani; Allison Naleway; Sue Reynolds; Sarah Ball; Sam Bozeman; Emily Henkle; Jennifer Meece; Mary Vandermause; Lydia Clipper; Mark Thompson Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Núria Torner; Ana Martínez; Luca Basile; M Angeles Marcos; Andrés Antón; M Mar Mosquera; Ricard Isanta; Carmen Cabezas; Mireia Jané; Angela Domínguez; The Pidirac Sentinel Surveillance Program Of Catalonia Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: John J Treanor; H Keipp Talbot; Suzanne E Ohmit; Laura A Coleman; Mark G Thompson; Po-Yung Cheng; Joshua G Petrie; Geraldine Lofthus; Jennifer K Meece; John V Williams; Lashondra Berman; Caroline Breese Hall; Arnold S Monto; Marie R Griffin; Edward Belongia; David K Shay Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 9.079