Literature DB >> 25725413

Equivalence of influenza A virus RNA recovery from nasal swabs when lysing the swab and storage medium versus storage medium alone.

Maya Nadimpalli1, Nora Pisanic2, Christopher D Heaney2, Jill Stewart3.   

Abstract

Surveillance of healthy individuals at high risk for zoonotic influenza A transmission is important for tracking trends in influenza A epidemiology. Practical measurement methods that maximize viral recovery and produce low variability are essential when low viral loads are expected. For this study, lysing both a nasal swab and its storage medium was compared to lysing the storage medium alone to determine which method results in greater influenza A virus recovery. Independent results from two laboratories suggest that including the swab in the lysis step does not lead to higher influenza A virus recovery, and that recovery is less variable when only the swab storage medium is extracted. These results indicate that simply lysing the swab storage medium is an effective extraction method for nasal swabs collected during studies of influenza A virus exposure among healthy populations.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Influenza A virus; Nasal swabs; Surveillance; Viral RNA extraction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25725413      PMCID: PMC4519353          DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol Methods        ISSN: 0166-0934            Impact factor:   2.014


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs for influenza detection in adults.

Authors:  Stephanie A Irving; Mary F Vandermause; David K Shay; Edward A Belongia
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2012-06-21

Review 2.  Adaptive pathways of zoonotic influenza viruses: from exposure to establishment in humans.

Authors:  Leslie A Reperant; Thijs Kuiken; Albert D M E Osterhaus
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Comparative study of nasopharyngeal aspirate and nasal swab specimens for diagnosis of acute viral respiratory infection.

Authors:  Rita Y T Sung; Paul K S Chan; Kai C Choi; Apple C M Yeung; Albert M Li; Julian W Tang; Margaret Ip; Tracy Tsen; E Anthony S Nelson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Effect of platform, reference material, and quantification model on enumeration of Enterococcus by quantitative PCR methods.

Authors:  Yiping Cao; Mano Sivaganesan; Julie Kinzelman; A Denene Blackwood; Rachel T Noble; Richard A Haugland; John F Griffith; Stephen B Weisberg
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Effect of swab matrix, storage time, and temperature on detection of avian influenza virus RNA in swab samples.

Authors:  Sasan R Fereidouni; Anja Globig; Elke Starick; Timm C Harder
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.577

6.  Pandemic influenza planning: shouldn't swine and poultry workers be included?

Authors:  Gregory C Gray; Darrell W Trampel; James A Roth
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 7.  The health of U.S. hired farm workers.

Authors:  Don Villarejo
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  Influenza vaccination of healthcare workers.

Authors:  K L Nichol; M Hauge
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.254

9.  Analysis of one-step and two-step real-time RT-PCR using SuperScript III.

Authors:  Michael J Wacker; Michael P Godard
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2005-09

10.  Design and performance testing of quantitative real time PCR assays for influenza A and B viral load measurement.

Authors:  C L Ward; M H Dempsey; C J A Ring; R E Kempson; L Zhang; D Gor; B W Snowden; M Tisdale
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.168

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Pig-2-Bac as a biomarker of occupational exposure to pigs and livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus among industrial hog operation workers.

Authors:  Nora Pisanic; Maya Nadimpalli; Jessica L Rinsky; Jill Stewart; Steve Wing; David C Love; Devon Hall; Christopher D Heaney
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  SARS-CoV-2 coinfections: Could influenza and the common cold be beneficial?

Authors:  Lubna Pinky; Hana M Dobrovolny
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 20.693

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.