| Literature DB >> 32974644 |
Leora R Feldstein1, Wesley H Self2, Jill M Ferdinands1, Adrienne G Randolph3,4, Michael Aboodi5, Adrienne H Baughman2, Samuel M Brown6, Matthew C Exline7, D Clark Files8, Kevin Gibbs8, Adit A Ginde9, Michelle N Gong10, Carlos G Grijalva2, Natasha Halasa11, Akram Khan12, Christopher J Lindsell2, Margaret Newhams3,4, Ithan D Peltan6, Matthew E Prekker13, Todd W Rice2, Nathan I Shapiro14, Jay Steingrub15, H Keipp Talbot2, M Elizabeth Halloran16,17, Manish Patel1.
Abstract
With rapid and accurate molecular influenza testing now widely available in clinical settings, influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies can prospectively select participants for enrollment based on real-time results rather than enrolling all eligible patients regardless of influenza status, as in the traditional test-negative design (TND). Thus, we explore advantages and disadvantages of modifying the TND for estimating VE by using real-time, clinically available viral testing results paired with acute respiratory infection eligibility criteria for identifying influenza cases and test-negative controls prior to enrollment. This modification, which we have called the real-time test-negative design (rtTND), has the potential to improve influenza VE studies by optimizing the case-to-test-negative control ratio, more accurately classifying influenza status, improving study efficiency, reducing study cost, and increasing study power to adequately estimate VE. Important considerations for limiting biases in the rtTND include the need for comprehensive clinical influenza testing at study sites and accurate influenza tests. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2020.Entities:
Keywords: clinical testing; influenza; real-time test-negative design; test-negative design; vaccine effectiveness
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 32974644 PMCID: PMC8096266 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Infect Dis ISSN: 1058-4838 Impact factor: 9.079