Literature DB >> 31217267

Comparison of Respiratory Specimen Collection Methods for Detection of Influenza Virus Infection by Reverse Transcription-PCR: a Literature Review.

Sarah Spencer1,2, Mark G Thompson3, Brendan Flannery3, Alicia Fry3.   

Abstract

The detection of influenza virus in respiratory specimens from ill individuals is the most commonly used method to identify influenza virus infection. A number of respiratory specimen types may be used, including swabs, brush, aspirate, and wash, and specimens may be collected from numerous sites, including the anterior and posterior nasopharynx, oropharynx, and nares. Traditionally, respiratory specimens from the nasopharynx have been considered to have the highest sensitivity for viral detection. However, as molecular assays such as reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) have increased the sensitivity of viral detection from respiratory specimens, the use of less-invasive and easier-to-obtain specimens has increased for the detection of influenza virus. This review presents and evaluates the sensitivities of respiratory specimen methods used in epidemiologic studies that used RT-PCR to detect influenza virus in respiratory specimens from ill patients. This literature review suggested that a combination of two less-invasive swabbing methods, such as nasal and oropharyngeal swabs, had about the same sensitivity as did nasopharyngeal specimens for influenza virus detection by RT-PCR. By combining two less-invasive collection methods, it may be possible to reduce barriers to enrollment without compromising influenza virus detection sensitivity.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RT-PCR; influenza; respiratory specimen

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31217267      PMCID: PMC6711916          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00027-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  28 in total

Review 1.  Optimal sampling sites and methods for detection of pathogens possibly causing community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  K Loens; L Van Heirstraeten; S Malhotra-Kumar; H Goossens; M Ieven
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of the NOW Influenza A & B, NOW Flu A, NOW Flu B, and Directigen Flu A+B assays, and immunofluorescence with viral culture for the detection of influenza A and B viruses.

Authors:  Marita Smit; Kirsten A Beynon; David R Murdoch; Lance C Jennings
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Evaluation of rapid influenza diagnostic tests for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) Virus - United States, 2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Effectiveness of reverse transcription-PCR, virus isolation, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of influenza A virus infection in different age groups.

Authors:  Christoph Steininger; Michael Kundi; Stephan W Aberle; Judith H Aberle; Theresia Popow-Kraupp
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Viral shedding in children with influenza virus infections treated with neuraminidase inhibitors.

Authors:  Masatoki Sato; Mitsuaki Hosoya; Kazuo Kato; Hitoshi Suzuki
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Rapid molecular detection of influenza outbreaks in nursing homes.

Authors:  J Gooskens; C M Swaan; E C J Claas; A C M Kroes
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 3.168

7.  Comparing nose-throat swabs and nasopharyngeal aspirates collected from children with symptoms for respiratory virus identification using real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Stephen B Lambert; David M Whiley; Nicholas T O'Neill; Emily C Andrews; Fiona M Canavan; Cheryl Bletchly; David J Siebert; Theo P Sloots; Michael D Nissen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Comparison of nasopharyngeal flocked swabs and aspirates for rapid diagnosis of respiratory viruses in children.

Authors:  K H Chan; J S M Peiris; W Lim; J M Nicholls; S S Chiu
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.168

9.  Use of throat swab or saliva specimens for detection of respiratory viruses in children.

Authors:  Joan L Robinson; Bonita E Lee; Sushma Kothapalli; William R Craig; Julie D Fox
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Comparison of four nasal sampling methods for the detection of viral pathogens by RT-PCR-A GA(2)LEN project.

Authors:  Irini S Spyridaki; Ioannis Christodoulou; Lieke de Beer; Vegard Hovland; Marcin Kurowski; Agnieszka Olszewska-Ziaber; Kai-Håkon Carlsen; Karin Lødrup-Carlsen; Cornelis M van Drunen; Marek L Kowalski; Richard Molenkamp; Nikolaos G Papadopoulos
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 2.014

View more
  13 in total

1.  COVID-19: before stopping specific infection prevention and control measures, be sure to exclude the diagnosis.

Authors:  E Farfour; M-C Ballester; M Lecuru; A Verrat; E Imhaus; F Mellot; F Karnycheff; M Vasse; C Cerf; P Lesprit
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  Laboratory testing for the diagnosis of COVID-19.

Authors:  Christopher K C Lai; Wilson Lam
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Growth capability of epidemic influenza viruses in Japan since the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.

Authors:  Akeno Tsuneki-Tokunaga; Kyosuke Kanai; Asao Itagaki; Hideaki Tsuchie; Takayoshi Okada; Masaaki Kasagi; Kiyoshi Tanaka; Miho Aoki; Alfredo Jr A Hinay; Seiji Kageyama
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.574

Review 4.  Microfluidic-based virus detection methods for respiratory diseases.

Authors:  E Alperay Tarim; Betul Karakuzu; Cemre Oksuz; Oyku Sarigil; Melike Kizilkaya; Mahmoud Khatib A A Al-Ruweidi; Huseyin Cagatay Yalcin; Engin Ozcivici; H Cumhur Tekin
Journal:  Emergent Mater       Date:  2021-03-25

Review 5.  Nucleic Acid-Based Sensing Techniques for Diagnostics and Surveillance of Influenza.

Authors:  Samantha J Courtney; Zachary R Stromberg; Jessica Z Kubicek-Sutherland
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-12

6.  In Reply: Navigating personal risk in rhinologic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Adam S DeConde; Carol H Yan; Robert P DeConde
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 5.426

Review 7.  Laboratory testing of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 (2019-nCoV): Current status, challenges, and countermeasures.

Authors:  Ying Yan; Le Chang; Lunan Wang
Journal:  Rev Med Virol       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 6.989

8.  SARS-CoV-2 detection in setting of viral swabs scarcity: Are MRSA swabs and viral swabs equivalent?

Authors:  Daniel G Federman; Shaili Gupta; Gary Stack; Sheldon M Campbell; David R Peaper; Louise M Dembry; Ann Fisher; Asim F Tarabar; Michael Kozal; Christopher B Ruser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Home collection of nasal swabs for detection of influenza in the Household Influenza Vaccine Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Ryan E Malosh; Joshua G Petrie; Amy P Callear; Arnold S Monto; Emily T Martin
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  The Allplex 2019-nCoV (Seegene) assay: which performances are for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis?

Authors:  Eric Farfour; Philippe Lesprit; Benoit Visseaux; Tiffany Pascreau; Emilie Jolly; Nadira Houhou; Laurence Mazaux; Marianne Asso-Bonnet; Marc Vasse
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.