Literature DB >> 22701773

Music perception ability of korean adult cochlear implant listeners.

Eunoak Kim1, Hyo-Jeong Lee, Hyung-Jong Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although the cochlear implant (CI) is successful for understanding speech in patients with severe to profound hearing loss, listening to music is a challenging task to most CI listeners. The purpose of this study was to assess music perception ability and to provide clinically useful information regarding CI rehabilitation.
METHODS: Ten normal hearing and ten CI listeners with implant experience, ranging 2 to 6 years, participated in the subtests of pitch, rhythm, melody, and instrument. A synthesized piano tone was used as musical stimuli. Participants were asked to discriminate two different tones during the pitch subtest. The rhythm subtest was constructed with sets of five, six, and seven intervals. The melody & instrument subtests assessed recognition of eight familiar melodies and five musical instruments from a closed set, respectively.
RESULTS: CI listeners performed significantly poorer than normal hearing listeners in pitch, melody, and instrument identification tasks. No significant differences were observed in rhythm recognition between groups. Correlations were not found between music perception ability and word recognition scores.
CONCLUSION: The results are consistent with previous studies that have shown that pitch, melody, and instrument identifications are difficult to identify for CI users. Our results can provide fundamental information concerning the development of CI rehabilitation tools.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Korean cochlear implant listener; Music perception

Year:  2012        PMID: 22701773      PMCID: PMC3369983          DOI: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 1976-8710            Impact factor:   3.372


  19 in total

1.  The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Bimodal stimulation: benefits for music perception and sound quality.

Authors:  Catherine M Sucher; Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2009

Review 3.  Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

4.  Clinical assessment of music perception in Korean cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Kyu Hwan Jung; Yang-Sun Cho; Jae Keun Cho; Ga Young Park; Eun Yeon Kim; Sung Hwa Hong; Won-Ho Chung; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K Gfeller; G Woodworth; D A Robin; S Witt; J F Knutson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.

Authors:  Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

7.  Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Effects of training on recognition of musical instruments presented through cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Virginia D Driscoll; Jacob Oleson; Dingfeng Jiang; Kate Gfeller
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.

Authors:  Robert Kang; Grace Liu Nimmons; Ward Drennan; Jeff Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Kaibao Nie; Jong Ho Won; Tina Worman; Bevan Yueh; Jay Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Grace L Nimmons; Robert S Kang; Ward R Drennan; Jeff Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Tina Worman; Bevan Yueh; Jay T Rubenstien
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of music perception, appraisal and experience in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jacob J Oleson; Kate Gfeller; Jillian Crosson; Virginia D Driscoll; Jong Ho Won; Elizabeth S Anderson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Using the HISQUI29 to assess the sound quality levels of Spanish adults with unilateral cochlear implants and no contralateral hearing.

Authors:  Miryam Calvino; Javier Gavilán; Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado; Rosa M Pérez-Mora; Elena Muñoz; Jesús Díez-Sebastián; Luis Lassaletta
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Hearables as a Gateway to Hearing Health Care.

Authors:  Hye Yoon Seol; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.340

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.