Literature DB >> 22696250

Experience-dependent attentional tuning of distractor rejection.

Daniel B Vatterott1, Shaun P Vecera.   

Abstract

Irrelevant salient distractors often capture attention, but given a sufficiently specific search template, these salient items no longer capture attention. In the present experiments, we investigated whether specific target templates are sufficient to resist capture, or whether experience with the salient distractors is also necessary. To test this hypothesis, observers completed four blocks of trials, each with a different-colored irrelevant singleton present on half of the trials. Color singletons captured attention early within a block, but after sufficient experience with the irrelevant singletons, those singletons no longer captured attention in the second halves of the blocks. This result suggests that to resist capture, a specific target template must be accompanied by experience-dependent attentional tuning to distractor properties.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22696250     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0280-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  26 in total

1.  Top-down control of attention: it's gradual, practice-dependent, and hierarchically organized.

Authors:  Michael Zehetleitner; Harriet Goschy; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Familiarity of background characters in visual scanning.

Authors:  G M Reicher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-05-26

4.  Effects of search mode and intertrial priming on singleton search.

Authors:  Dominique Lamy; Tomer Carmel; Howard E Egeth; Andrew B Leber
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-08

5.  It's under control: top-down search strategies can override attentional capture.

Authors:  Andrew B Leber; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

6.  Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: intertrial priming does.

Authors:  Yaïr Pinto; Christian N L Olivers; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-11

7.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

Review 8.  Where perception meets memory: a review of repetition priming in visual search tasks.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Gianluca Campana
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Attention capture by novel stimuli.

Authors:  W A Johnston; K J Hawley; S H Plewe; J M Elliott; M J DeWitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1990-12

10.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997
View more
  45 in total

1.  Visuospatial cueing by self-caused features: Orienting of attention and action-outcome associative learning.

Authors:  Davood G Gozli; Hira Aslam; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

2.  Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?

Authors:  Jason Rajsic; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Gaze dynamics of feature-based distractor inhibition under prior-knowledge and expectations.

Authors:  Wen Wen; Yangming Zhang; Sheng Li
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Attentional capture alters feature perception.

Authors:  Jiageng Chen; Andrew B Leber; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Martha Forloines; Zhiheng Zhou; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 6.  Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-10-29

7.  Diminished distractor exclusion for magnocellular features near the hand.

Authors:  Tony Thomas; Meera Mary Sunny
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Establishment of an attentional set via statistical learning.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Oculomotor Inhibition of Salient Distractors: Voluntary Inhibition Cannot Override Selection History.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; John M Gaspar; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-04-09

10.  When Does Feature Search Fail to Protect Against Attentional Capture?

Authors:  Tashina Graves; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.