Literature DB >> 1011001

Familiarity of background characters in visual scanning.

G M Reicher.   

Abstract

It is much easier to look for an unfamiliar character (upsidedown A) embedded among familiar ones than to look for a familiar character (A) among unfamiliar ones. Furthermore, the nature of the background seems more important to performance than the nature of the target. The basic experiments involved showing subjects a matrix with nine characters. On target-present trials, eight of the characters were background items and one character was a target item. On target-absent trials, all nine matrix positions were filled by background characters. The types of unfamiliar characters used were rotated English letters, partial letters, and Gibson figures. The familiar characters were upright English letters or digits. Search was easier through familiar backgrounds than through unfamiliar backgrounds with all of the character types used and whether measuring speed or accuracy.

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1011001     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.2.4.522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  22 in total

1.  Negative priming and stimulus familiarity: what causes opposite results?

Authors:  Jun-Ichi Nagai; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

2.  Experience-dependent attentional tuning of distractor rejection.

Authors:  Daniel B Vatterott; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

3.  Enhancing visual working memory encoding: The role of target novelty.

Authors:  Jutta S Mayer; Jejoong Kim; Sohee Park
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011

4.  Perceptual inhibition of expected inputs: The key that opens closed minds.

Authors:  W A Johnston; K J Hawley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

5.  Novel popout without novelty.

Authors:  K A Diliberto; J Altarriba; W T Neill
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-05

6.  The visual search analogue of latent inhibition: implications for theories of irrelevant stimulus processing in normal and schizophrenic groups.

Authors:  R E Lubow; Oren Kaplan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

7.  Familiarity and visual change detection.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-10

8.  Familiarity and attention: does what we know affect what we notice?

Authors:  J Christie; R Klein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-09

9.  Redundancy gains and coactivation with two different targets: the problem of target preferences and the effects of display frequency.

Authors:  J T Mordkoff; J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-05

10.  Failure to benefit from target novelty during encoding contributes to working memory deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jutta S Mayer; Jejoong Kim; Sohee Park
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 1.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.