Literature DB >> 27504073

When Does Feature Search Fail to Protect Against Attentional Capture?

Tashina Graves1, Howard E Egeth1.   

Abstract

When participants search for a shape (e.g., a circle) among a set of homogenous shapes (e.g., triangles) they are subject to distraction by color singletons that are more salient than the target. However, when participants search for a shape among heterogeneous shapes, the presence of a non-target color singleton does not slow responses to the target. Attempts have been made to explain these results from both bottom-up and top-down perspectives. What both accounts have in common is that they do not predict the occurrence of attentional capture on typical feature search displays. Here, we present a case where manipulating selection history, rather than the displays themselves, leads to attentional capture on feature search trials. The ability to map specific colors to the target and distractor appears to be what enables resistance to capture during feature search.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attentional capture; attentional control; feature search; search modes; selection history

Year:  2016        PMID: 27504073      PMCID: PMC4975547          DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2016.1145159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis cogn        ISSN: 1350-6285


  26 in total

1.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

2.  Repetition priming in visual search: episodic retrieval, not feature priming.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Alex O Holcombe; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01

3.  Top-down control of attention: it's gradual, practice-dependent, and hierarchically organized.

Authors:  Michael Zehetleitner; Harriet Goschy; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-05-26

5.  Effects of search mode and intertrial priming on singleton search.

Authors:  Dominique Lamy; Tomer Carmel; Howard E Egeth; Andrew B Leber
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-08

6.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

7.  Top-down dimensional weight set determines the capture of visual attention: evidence from the PCN component.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Hermann J Müller; Michael Zehetleitner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 9.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Persistence of value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-10-29

Review 2.  Does feature intertrial priming guide attention? The jury is still out.

Authors:  Aniruddha Ramgir; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-10-08

3.  On preventing attention capture: Is singleton suppression actually singleton suppression?

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Eric Ruthruff; Christopher Hauck
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-09-24

4.  Do salient abrupt onsets trigger suppression?

Authors:  Emily Burgess; Christopher Hauck; Emile De Pooter; Eric Ruthruff; Mei-Ching Lien
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  Search mode, not the attentional window, determines the magnitude of attentional capture.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Stanislas Huynh Cong
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  Oculomotor Inhibition of Salient Distractors: Voluntary Inhibition Cannot Override Selection History.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; John M Gaspar; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-04-09

7.  Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Stanislas Huynh Cong
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.

Authors:  Benchi Wang; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  A saliency-specific and dimension-independent mechanism of distractor suppression.

Authors:  Dongyu Gong; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.