OBJECTIVES: In transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), assessment of the aortic annulus is mandatory. We sought to investigate the correlation between trans-oesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) for annulus diameter assessment before TAVI. METHODS: A total of 122 patients (67 male, mean age 84 ± 6 years) underwent MDCT and TEE for TAVI planning. In TEE annulus diameters were obtained in a long-axis view at diastole. MDCT data were evaluated using MPR images, and corresponding projections were adjusted for MDCT and TEE. Patients were classified by the predominant localisation of aortic valve calcifications, and annulus diameters between TEE and MDCT were correlated. Additionally, the eccentricity of the aortic annulus was calculated. RESULTS: Mean eccentricity of the aortic annulus determined by MDCT was 0.34 ± 0.17, with no difference according to valve calcification. Regarding the aortic annulus diameter, the mean values measured were 24.3 ± 2.1 mm in MDCT and 24.0 ± 2.5 mm in TEE (P < 0.0001 for agreement). CONCLUSIONS: Independent of the pattern of aortic valve calcification, close correlation is found between CT and TEE measurements of the aortic annulus diameter. In addition, CT demonstrates the non-circular shape of the aortic annulus. KEY POINTS: Accurate assessment of aortic annulus before transcatheter aortic valve implantation is crucial. Trans-oesophageal echocardiography has been the preferred method for aortic annulus assessment. We demonstrated a strong correlation between TEE and CT for annulus dimensions. CT reliably demonstrates the non-circular shape of the aortic annulus. CT could therefore be generally used for aortic annulus assessment before TAVI.
OBJECTIVES: In transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), assessment of the aortic annulus is mandatory. We sought to investigate the correlation between trans-oesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) for annulus diameter assessment before TAVI. METHODS: A total of 122 patients (67 male, mean age 84 ± 6 years) underwent MDCT and TEE for TAVI planning. In TEE annulus diameters were obtained in a long-axis view at diastole. MDCT data were evaluated using MPR images, and corresponding projections were adjusted for MDCT and TEE. Patients were classified by the predominant localisation of aortic valve calcifications, and annulus diameters between TEE and MDCT were correlated. Additionally, the eccentricity of the aortic annulus was calculated. RESULTS: Mean eccentricity of the aortic annulus determined by MDCT was 0.34 ± 0.17, with no difference according to valve calcification. Regarding the aortic annulus diameter, the mean values measured were 24.3 ± 2.1 mm in MDCT and 24.0 ± 2.5 mm in TEE (P < 0.0001 for agreement). CONCLUSIONS: Independent of the pattern of aortic valve calcification, close correlation is found between CT and TEE measurements of the aortic annulus diameter. In addition, CT demonstrates the non-circular shape of the aortic annulus. KEY POINTS: Accurate assessment of aortic annulus before transcatheter aortic valve implantation is crucial. Trans-oesophageal echocardiography has been the preferred method for aortic annulus assessment. We demonstrated a strong correlation between TEE and CT for annulus dimensions. CT reliably demonstrates the non-circular shape of the aortic annulus. CT could therefore be generally used for aortic annulus assessment before TAVI.
Authors: B J Bouma; R B van Den Brink; J H van Der Meulen; H A Verheul; E C Cheriex; H P Hamer; E Dekker; K I Lie; J G Tijssen Journal: Heart Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; Kanu Chatterjee; Antonio C de Leon; David P Faxon; Michael D Freed; William H Gaasch; Bruce Whitney Lytle; Rick A Nishimura; Patrick T O'Gara; Robert A O'Rourke; Catherine M Otto; Pravin M Shah; Jack S Shanewise; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Valentin Fuster; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon A Hunt; Bruce W Lytle; Rick Nishimura; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-08-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Carl J Schultz; Adriaan Moelker; Nicolo Piazza; Apostolos Tzikas; Amber Otten; Rutger J Nuis; Lisan A Neefjes; Robert J van Geuns; Pim de Feyter; Gabriel Krestin; Patrick W Serruys; Peter P T de Jaegere Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-12-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Alain Cribier; Helene Eltchaninoff; Assaf Bash; Nicolas Borenstein; Christophe Tron; Fabrice Bauer; Genevieve Derumeaux; Frederic Anselme; François Laborde; Martin B Leon Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-12-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: F Schwarz; P Baumann; J Manthey; M Hoffmann; G Schuler; H C Mehmel; W Schmitz; W Kübler Journal: Circulation Date: 1982-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Laurens F Tops; David A Wood; Victoria Delgado; Joanne D Schuijf; John R Mayo; Sanjeevan Pasupati; Frouke P L Lamers; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; John G Webb; Jeroen J Bax Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2008-05
Authors: David A Wood; Laurens F Tops; John R Mayo; Sanjeevan Pasupati; Martin J Schalij; Karin Humphries; May Lee; Abdullah Al Ali; Brad Munt; Rob Moss; Christopher R Thompson; Jeroen J Bax; John G Webb Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Csilla Celeng; Márton Kolossváry; Attila Kovács; Andrea Ágnes Molnár; Bálint Szilveszter; Tamás Horváth; Mihály Károlyi; Ádám L Jermendy; Ádám D Tárnoki; Dávid L Tárnoki; Júlia Karády; Szilard Voros; György Jermendy; Béla Merkely; Pál Maurovich-Horvat Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Simon S Martin; Moritz H Albrecht; Julian L Wichmann; Kristina Hüsers; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Christian Booz; Boris Bodelle; Ralf W Bauer; Sarah C Metzger; Thomas J Vogl; Thomas Lehnert Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-05-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Barbora Horehledova; Casper Mihl; Ellen Boswijk; Genevieve A J C Crombag; Estelle C Nijssen; Patty J Nelemans; Leo F Veenstra; Joachim E Wildberger; Marco Das Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 3.240