Literature DB >> 21361438

Effects of aspirin on distortion product fine structure: interpreted by the two-source model for distortion product otoacoustic emissions generation.

Aparna Rao1, Glenis R Long.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure is due to the interaction of two major components coming from different places in the cochlea. One component is generated from the region of maximal overlap of the traveling waves generated by the two primaries and is attributed to nonlinear distortion (nonlinear component). The other component arises predominantly from the tonotopic region of the distortion product and is attributed to linear coherent reflection (reflection component). Aspirin (salicylate) ototoxicity can cause reversible hearing loss and reduces otoacoustic emission generation in the cochlea. The two components are expected to be affected differentially by cochlear health. Changes in DPOAE fine structure were recorded longitudinally in three subjects before, during, and after aspirin consumption. Full data sets were analyzed for two subjects, but only partial data could be analyzed from the third subject. Resulting changes in the two components of DPOAE fine structure revealed variability among subjects and differential effects on the two components. For low-intensity primaries, both components were reduced with the reflection component being more vulnerable. For high-intensity primaries, the nonlinear component showed little or no change, but the reflection component was always reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21361438     DOI: 10.1121/1.3523308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Accuracy of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions-based ototoxicity monitoring using various primary frequency step-sizes.

Authors:  Garnett P McMillan; Dawn Konrad-Martin; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Meta-Analysis of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Retest Variability for Serial Monitoring of Cochlear Function in Adults.

Authors:  Kelly M Reavis; Garnett P McMillan; Marilyn F Dille; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Maturation and aging of the human cochlea: a view through the DPOAE looking glass.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-03

5.  Characteristics of the 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emission in a normal hearing population.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Jonathan H Siegel; Jungmee Lee; Jungwha Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Exploiting Dual Otoacoustic Emission Sources.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2015

Review 8.  Clinical measures of auditory function: the cochlea and beyond.

Authors:  Rachael R Baiduc; Gayla L Poling; OiSaeng Hong; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Dis Mon       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.800

9.  Clinical Utilisation of High-frequency DPOAEs.

Authors:  Gayla Poling; Jungmee Lee; Jonathan Siegel; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  ENT Audiol News       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct

10.  The statistical basis for serial monitoring in audiology.

Authors:  Garnett P McMillan; Kelly M Reavis; Dawn Konrad-Martin; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.