Literature DB >> 29496363

Simulated auditory nerve axon demyelination alters sensitivity and response timing to extracellular stimulation.

Jesse M Resnick1, Gabrielle E O'Brien2, Jay T Rubinstein3.   

Abstract

Since cochlear implant function involves direct depolarization of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) by applied current, SGN physiological health must be an important factor in cochlear implant (CI) outcomes. This expected relationship has, however, been difficult to confirm in implant recipients. Suggestively, animal studies have demonstrated both acute and progressive SGN ultrastructural changes (notably axon demyelination), even in the absence of soma death, and corresponding altered physiology following sensorineural deafening. Whether such demyelination occurs in humans and how such changes might impact CI function remains unknown. To approach this problem, we incorporated SGN demyelination into a biophysical model of extracellular stimulation of SGN fibers. Our approach enabled exploration of the entire parameter space corresponding to simulated myelin diameter and extent of fiber affected. All simulated fibers were stimulated distally with anodic monophasic, cathodic monophasic, anode-phase-first (AF) biphasic, and cathode-phase-first (CF) biphasic pulses from an extracellular disc electrode and monitored for spikes centrally. Not surprisingly, axon sensitivity generally decreased with demyelination, resulting in elevated thresholds, however, this effect was strongly non-uniform. Fibers with severe demyelination affecting only the most peripheral nodes responded nearly identically to normally myelinated fibers. Additionally, partial demyelination (<50%) yielded only minimal increases in threshold even when the entire fiber was impacted. The temporal effects of demyelination were more unexpected. Both latency and jitter of responses demonstrated resilience to modest changes but exhibited strongly non-monotonic and stimulus-dependent relationships to more profound demyelination. Normal, and modestly demyelinated fibers, were more sensitive to cathodic than anodic monophasic pulses and to CF than AF biphasic pulses, however, when demyelination was more severe these relative sensitivities were reversed. Comparison of threshold crossing between nodal segments demonstrated stimulus-dependent shifts in action potential initiation with different fiber demyelination states. For some demyelination scenarios, both phases of biphasic pulses could initiate action potentials at threshold resulting in bimodal latency and initiation site distributions and dramatically increased jitter. In summary, simulated demyelination leads to complex changes in fiber sensitivity and spike timing, mediated by alterations in action potential initiation site and slowed action potential conduction due to non-uniformities in the electrical properties of axons. Such demyelination-induced changes, if present in implantees, would have profound implications for the detection of fine temporal cues but not disrupt cues on the time scale of speech envelopes. These simulation results highlight the importance of exploring the SGN ultrastructural changes caused by a given etiology of hearing loss to more accurately predict cochlear implantation outcomes.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biophysical modeling; Demyelination; Interaural timing difference; Spiral ganglion neuron

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29496363      PMCID: PMC5846345          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  69 in total

1.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Converging measures of binaural detection yield estimates of precision of coding of interaural temporal disparities.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach.

Authors:  Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Physical factors in angular localization.

Authors:  B NORDLUND
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  A fast, stochastic, and adaptive model of auditory nerve responses to cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  M J van Gendt; J J Briaire; R K Kalkman; J H M Frijns
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  A quantitative approach to modeling mammalian myelinated nerve fibers for electrical prosthesis design.

Authors:  J H Frijns; J Mooij; J H ten Kate
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Morphometry of intracellularly labeled neurons of the auditory nerve: correlations with functional properties.

Authors:  M C Liberman; M E Oliver
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1984-02-20       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  The cochlear nerve in the cat: topography, cochleotopy, and fiber spectrum.

Authors:  A R Arnesen; K K Osen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1978-04-15       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Sensorineural hearing loss during development: morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem.

Authors:  N A Hardie; R K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Asymmetric pulses in cochlear implants: effects of pulse shape, polarity, and rate.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Astrid van Wieringen; Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-20
View more
  19 in total

1.  Neural ITD Sensitivity and Temporal Coding with Cochlear Implants in an Animal Model of Early-Onset Deafness.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Brian D Buechel; Woongsang Sunwoo; Joseph D Wagner; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-08

2.  Cochlear implants and other inner ear prostheses: today and tomorrow.

Authors:  Lina Aj Reiss
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-08-14

3.  Polarity Sensitivity as a Potential Correlate of Neural Degeneration in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Quentin Mesnildrey; Frédéric Venail; Robert P Carlyon; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-04

4.  Chronic Bilateral Cochlear Implant Stimulation Partially Restores Neural Binaural Sensitivity in Neonatally-Deaf Rabbits.

Authors:  Woongsang Sunwoo; Bertrand Delgutte; Yoojin Chung
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Macrostructural Changes of the Acoustic Radiation in Humans with Hearing Loss and Tinnitus Revealed with Fixel-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Elouise A Koops; Shereif Haykal; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Neural Adaptation of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Is Not Affected by Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened, Middle-aged, and Elderly Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Shuman He; Jeffrey Skidmore; Sara Conroy; William J Riggs; Brittney L Carter; Ruili Xie
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners: Effects of age and the electrode-neuron interface.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Simulated auditory fiber myelination heterogeneity desynchronizes population responses to electrical stimulation limiting inter-aural timing difference representation.

Authors:  Jesse M Resnick; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The Effect of Pulse Polarity on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Jeffrey Skidmore; Jianfen Luo; Xiuhua Chao; Ruijie Wang; Haibo Wang; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.