Literature DB >> 22669731

Usefulness of IDEAL T2-weighted FSE and SPGR imaging in reducing metallic artifacts in the postoperative ankles with metallic hardware.

Jung Bin Lee1, Jang Gyu Cha, Min Hee Lee, Young Koo Lee, Eun Hye Lee, Chan Hong Jeon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this work is to prospectively compare the effectiveness of iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL), T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE), and spoiled gradient-echo (SPGR) MR imaging to frequency selective fat suppression (FSFS) protocols for minimizing metallic artifacts in postoperative ankles with metallic hardware.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The T2-weighted and SPGR imaging with IDEAL and FSFS were performed on 21 ankles of 21 patients with metallic hardware. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently analyzed techniques for visualization of ankle ligaments and articular cartilage, uniformity of fat saturation, and relative size of the metallic artifacts. A paired t test was used for statistical comparisons of MR images between IDEAL and FSFS groups.
RESULTS: IDEAL T2-weighted FSE and SPGR images enabled significantly improved visualization of articular cartilage (p < 0.05), the size of metallic artifact (p < 0.05), and the uniformity of fat saturation (p < 0.05). However, no significant improvement was found in the visibility of ligaments.
CONCLUSIONS: IDEAL T2-weighted FSE and SPGR imaging effectively reduces the degree of tissue-obscuring artifacts produced by fixation hardware in ankle joints and improves image quality compared to FSFS T2-weighted FSE and SPGR imaging. However, visibility of ligaments was not improved using IDEAL imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22669731     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-012-1449-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  25 in total

Review 1.  Postoperative imaging of the ankle and foot.

Authors:  Diane Bergin; William B Morrison
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  IDEAL imaging of the musculoskeletal system: robust water fat separation for uniform fat suppression, marrow evaluation, and cartilage imaging.

Authors:  Clint M Gerdes; Richard Kijowski; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  A multispectral three-dimensional acquisition technique for imaging near metal implants.

Authors:  Kevin M Koch; John E Lorbiecki; R Scott Hinks; Kevin F King
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  MR fat suppression technique in the evaluation of normal structures of the knee.

Authors:  S Totterman; S L Weiss; J Szumowski; R W Katzberg; J P Hornak; H M Proskin; J Eisen
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 5.  Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls.

Authors:  E M Delfaut; J Beltran; G Johnson; J Rousseau; X Marchandise; A Cotten
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 6.  Recent advances in MRI of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Garry E Gold; Christina A Chen; Seungbum Koo; Brian A Hargreaves; Neal K Bangerter
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.

Authors:  D G Disler; T L Peters; S J Muscoreil; L M Ratner; W A Wagle; J P Cousins; M D Rifkin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  SEMAC: Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction in MRI.

Authors:  Wenmiao Lu; Kim Butts Pauly; Garry E Gold; John M Pauly; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Knee hyaline cartilage evaluated with MR imaging: a cadaveric study involving multiple imaging sequences and intraarticular injection of gadolinium and saline solution.

Authors:  V P Chandnani; C Ho; P Chu; D Trudell; D Resnick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Comparison of new sequences for high-resolution cartilage imaging.

Authors:  Brian A Hargreaves; Garry E Gold; Christopher F Beaulieu; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Dwight G Nishimura; John M Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  5 in total

1.  Fracture of ankle: MRI using opposed-phase imaging obtained from turbo spin echo modified Dixon image shows improved sensitivity.

Authors:  Jin Hee You; In Hwan Kim; Jinwoo Hwang; Hye Sun Lee; Eun Hae Park
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Usefulness of the fast spin-echo three-point Dixon (mDixon) image of the knee joint on 3.0-T MRI: comparison with conventional fast spin-echo T2 weighted image.

Authors:  Hee J Park; So Y Lee; Myung H Rho; Eun C Chung; Jin H Ahn; Jai H Park; In S Lee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences.

Authors:  Tim Hilgenfeld; Marcel Prager; Franz S Schwindling; Johann M E Jende; Peter Rammelsberg; Martin Bendszus; Sabine Heiland; Alexander Juerchott
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Comparison Study between Conventional Sequence and Slice-Encoding Metal Artifact Correction (SEMAC) in the Diagnosis of Postoperative Complications in Patients Receiving Lumbar Inter-Body Fusion and Pedicle Screw Fixation Surgery.

Authors:  Sol Bee Han; Young Cheol Yoon; Jong Won Kwon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of MRI Visualization Following Minimally Invasive and Open TLIF: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Vadim A Byvaltsev; Andrei A Kalinin; Morgan B Giers; Valerii V Shepelev; Yurii Ya Pestryakov; Mikhail Yu Biryuchkov
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.