OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to discuss the acquisition of high-quality MR images of the musculoskeletal system with uniform fat suppression using iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL). IDEAL is a three-point water-fat separation method that provides robust fat suppression even in the complex magnetic environments commonly encountered during clinical musculoskeletal imaging. CONCLUSION: The IDEAL technique provides uniform fat saturation even in complex magnetic environments and simultaneously produces in-phase and opposed-phase images that may be useful for characterization of osseous lesions. The IDEAL water-fat separation method is highly versatile and has been successfully combined with T1-weighted, T2-weighted, steady-state free precession, and spoiled gradient-recalled echo techniques to produce high-quality MR images in clinically acceptable scanning times.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to discuss the acquisition of high-quality MR images of the musculoskeletal system with uniform fat suppression using iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL). IDEAL is a three-point water-fat separation method that provides robust fat suppression even in the complex magnetic environments commonly encountered during clinical musculoskeletal imaging. CONCLUSION: The IDEAL technique provides uniform fat saturation even in complex magnetic environments and simultaneously produces in-phase and opposed-phase images that may be useful for characterization of osseous lesions. The IDEAL water-fat separation method is highly versatile and has been successfully combined with T1-weighted, T2-weighted, steady-state free precession, and spoiled gradient-recalled echo techniques to produce high-quality MR images in clinically acceptable scanning times.
Authors: Chad A Kohl; F Spencer Chivers; Roxanne Lorans; Catherine C Roberts; Mark J Kransdorf Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Garry E Gold; Christina A Chen; Seungbum Koo; Brian A Hargreaves; Neal K Bangerter Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Filippo Del Grande; Francesco Santini; Daniel A Herzka; Michael R Aro; Cooper W Dean; Garry E Gold; John A Carrino Journal: Radiographics Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Y Kaichi; K Tanitame; H Itakura; H Ohno; M Yoneda; Y Takahashi; Y Akiyama; K Awai Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 3.825