Literature DB >> 19696274

Recent advances in MRI of articular cartilage.

Garry E Gold1, Christina A Chen, Seungbum Koo, Brian A Hargreaves, Neal K Bangerter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: MRI is the most accurate noninvasive method available to diagnose disorders of articular cartilage. Conventional 2D and 3D approaches show changes in cartilage morphology. Faster 3D imaging methods with isotropic resolution can be reformatted into arbitrary planes for improved detection and visualization of pathology. Unique contrast mechanisms allow us to probe cartilage physiology and detect changes in cartilage macromolecules.
CONCLUSION: MRI has great promise as a noninvasive comprehensive tool for cartilage evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19696274      PMCID: PMC2879429          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  97 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  W B van den Berg
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  Magnetization preparation during the steady state: fat-saturated 3D TrueFISP.

Authors:  K Scheffler; O Heid; J Hennig
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Spatial variation in cartilage T2 of the knee.

Authors:  H E Smith; T J Mosher; B J Dardzinski; B G Collins; C M Collins; Q X Yang; V J Schmithorst; M B Smith
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  23Na MRI accurately measures fixed charge density in articular cartilage.

Authors:  Erik M Shapiro; Arijitt Borthakur; Alexander Gougoutas; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Human knee: in vivo T1(rho)-weighted MR imaging at 1.5 T--preliminary experience.

Authors:  U Duvvuri; S R Charagundla; S B Kudchodkar; J H Kaufman; J B Kneeland; R Rizi; J S Leigh; R Reddy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee.

Authors:  T R McCauley; D G Disler
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage.

Authors:  M Recht; V Bobic; D Burstein; D Disler; G Gold; M Gray; J Kramer; P Lang; T McCauley; C Winalski
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Rapid MR imaging of articular cartilage with steady-state free precession and multipoint fat-water separation.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Norbert J Pelc; Marcus T Alley; Garry E Gold
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Imaging of the articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: 3D spatial-spectral spoiled gradient-echo vs. fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yoshioka; Marcus Alley; Daniel Steines; Kathryn Stevens; Erika Rubesova; Mark Genovese; Michael F Dillingham; Philipp Lang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Measurement accuracy of focal cartilage defects from MRI and correlation of MRI graded lesions with histology: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Chris A McGibbon; Carol A Trahan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.576

View more
  44 in total

1.  Classification of sodium MRI data of cartilage using machine learning.

Authors:  Guillaume Madelin; Frederick Poidevin; Antonios Makrymallis; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Altered swelling and ion fluxes in articular cartilage as a biomarker in osteoarthritis and joint immobilization: a computational analysis.

Authors:  Sara Manzano; Raquel Manzano; Manuel Doblaré; Mohamed Hamdy Doweidar
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Advanced MRI of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Hillary J Braun; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2011-10

4.  Usefulness of IDEAL T2-weighted FSE and SPGR imaging in reducing metallic artifacts in the postoperative ankles with metallic hardware.

Authors:  Jung Bin Lee; Jang Gyu Cha; Min Hee Lee; Young Koo Lee; Eun Hye Lee; Chan Hong Jeon
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Proton density-weighted MR imaging of the knee: fat suppression versus without fat suppression.

Authors:  So-Yeon Lee; Won-Hee Jee; Sun Ki Kim; Jung-Man Kim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  MRI of hip cartilage: joint morphology, structure, and composition.

Authors:  Stephanie L Gold; Alissa J Burge; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: optimizing 3 Tesla imaging.

Authors:  Lauren Shapiro; Ernesto Staroswiecki; Garry Gold
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.800

8.  Repair of massively defected hemi-joints using demineralized osteoarticular allografts with protected cartilage.

Authors:  Siming Li; Xiaohong Yang; Shenghui Tang; Xunmeng Zhang; Zhencheng Feng; Shuliang Cui
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  A review of imaging modalities for the hip.

Authors:  Alexander E Weber; Jon A Jacobson; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-09

Review 10.  MR imaging of articular cartilage physiology.

Authors:  Jung-Ah Choi; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.