Literature DB >> 12652541

Comparison of new sequences for high-resolution cartilage imaging.

Brian A Hargreaves1, Garry E Gold, Christopher F Beaulieu, Shreyas S Vasanawala, Dwight G Nishimura, John M Pauly.   

Abstract

The high prevalence of osteoarthritis continues to demand improved accuracy in detecting cartilage injury and monitoring its response to different treatments. MRI is the most accurate noninvasive method of diagnosing cartilage lesions. However, MR imaging of cartilage is limited by scan time, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and image contrast. Recently, there has been renewed interest in SNR-efficient imaging sequences for imaging cartilage, including various forms of steady-state free-precession as well as driven-equilibrium imaging. This work compares several of these sequences with existing methods, both theoretically and in normal volunteers. Results show that the new steady-state methods increase SNR-efficiency by as much as 30% and improve cartilage-synovial fluid contrast by a factor of three. Additionally, these methods markedly decrease minimum scan times, while providing 3D coverage without the characteristic blurring seen in fast spin-echo images. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12652541     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  25 in total

1.  Usefulness of IDEAL T2-weighted FSE and SPGR imaging in reducing metallic artifacts in the postoperative ankles with metallic hardware.

Authors:  Jung Bin Lee; Jang Gyu Cha; Min Hee Lee; Young Koo Lee; Eun Hye Lee; Chan Hong Jeon
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Fast chemical shift mapping with multiecho balanced SSFP.

Authors:  Jochen Leupold; Oliver Wieben; Sven Månsson; Oliver Speck; Klaus Scheffler; J Stefan Petersson; Jürgen Hennig
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Resolution 'scaling law' in MRI of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Y Xia
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 4.  Imaging osteoarthritis: magnetic resonance imaging versus x-ray.

Authors:  Charles Peterfy; Manish Kothari
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Volume rendering based on magnetic resonance imaging: advances in understanding the three-dimensional anatomy of the human knee.

Authors:  Giuseppe Anastasi; Placido Bramanti; Paolo Di Bella; Angelo Favaloro; Fabio Trimarchi; Ludovico Magaudda; Michele Gaeta; Emanuele Scribano; Daniele Bruschetta; Demetrio Milardi
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Improving contrast to noise ratio of resonance frequency contrast images (phase images) using balanced steady-state free precession.

Authors:  Jongho Lee; Masaki Fukunaga; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The relationship between the MRI features of mild osteoarthritis in the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral compartments of the knee.

Authors:  Peter R Kornaat; Iain Watt; Naghmeh Riyazi; Margreet Kloppenburg; Johan L Bloem
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Articular cartilage and labral lesions of the glenohumeral joint: diagnostic performance of 3D water-excitation true FISP MR arthrography.

Authors:  Tobias Johannes Dietrich; Marco Zanetti; Nadja Saupe; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Sandro F Fucentese; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Simultaneous estimation of tongue volume and fat fraction using IDEAL-FSE.

Authors:  Ianessa A Humbert; Scott B Reeder; Eva J Porcaro; Stephanie A Kays; Jean H Brittain; Joanne Robbins
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Multiple repetition time balanced steady-state free precession imaging.

Authors:  Tolga Cukur; Dwight G Nishimura
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.