Literature DB >> 22642672

Changes in attention to relevant and irrelevant stimuli during spatial learning.

Steven F Cuell1, Mark A Good, Jemma C Dopson, John M Pearce, Murray R Horne.   

Abstract

Rats were trained in 2 experiments to find a submerged platform that was situated in 1 of 2 of the 4 corners of a rectangular pool with a curved long wall. Different landmarks occupied 2 of the corners on every trial, and the platform was always situated near a landmark. For the place group in each experiment, the location of the platform was indicated by the shape of the pool and stimuli outside the pool (place cues), but not the landmarks within the pool. For the landmark groups, the landmarks, not the place cues, indicated where the platform could be found. During Stage 2, 2 of the place cues were relevant, and 2 of the landmarks were irrelevant, for a new discrimination. The place cues better controlled searching for the platform in the place group than in the landmark group when the place cues had initially been relevant by signaling the presence (Experiment 1) or the absence (Experiment 2) of the platform. The results show that animals pay more attention to relevant than irrelevant cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22642672      PMCID: PMC4231295          DOI: 10.1037/a0028491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  21 in total

1.  INTRADIMENSIONAL AND EXTRADIMENSIONAL SHIFTS IN THE RAT.

Authors:  B E SHEPP; P D EIMAS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1964-06

Review 2.  The role of associative history in models of associative learning: a selective review and a hybrid model.

Authors:  M E Le Pelley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2004-07

3.  Differences in the associability of relevant and irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  Jemma C Dopson; Guillem R Esber; John M Pearce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-04

4.  Learning about environmental geometry: an associative model.

Authors:  Noam Y Miller; Sara J Shettleworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2007-07

5.  The nature of discrimination learning in pigeons.

Authors:  John M Pearce; Guillem R Esber; David N George; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Acquired distinctiveness of cues; transfer between discrimination on the basis of familiarity with the stimulus.

Authors:  D H LAWRENCE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1949-12

7.  Acquired distinctiveness of cues: selective association in a constant stimulus situation.

Authors:  D H LAWRENCE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1950-04

8.  Effects of repeated disorientation on the acquisition of spatial tasks in rats: dissociation between the appetitive radial arm maze and aversive water maze.

Authors:  P A Dudchenko; J P Goodridge; D A Seiterle; J S Taube
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1997-04

9.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  J M Pearce; G Hall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in spatial learning.

Authors:  J B Trobalon; D Miguelez; I P L McLaren; N J Mackintosh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  Learned predictiveness training modulates biases towards using boundary or landmark cues during navigation.

Authors:  Matthew G Buckley; Alastair D Smith; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Shape shifting: Local landmarks interfere with navigation by, and recognition of, global shape.

Authors:  Matthew G Buckley; Alastair D Smith; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.051

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.