Literature DB >> 12735278

Intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in spatial learning.

J B Trobalon1, D Miguelez, I P L McLaren, N J Mackintosh.   

Abstract

Animals trained on 2 discriminations learn the 2nd rapidly if the relevant stimuli are from the same dimension as the 1st (an intradimensional or ID shift) but slowly if the relevant stimuli for the 2 problems are from different dimensions (an extradimensional or ED shift). Four experiments examined ID and ED shifts in spatial learning. Rats trained on 2 spatial problems learned the 2nd more rapidly than rats whose 1st problem had been nonspatial. But this difference between ID and ED shifts depended on the spatial relationship between rewarded (S+) and unrewarded (S-) alternatives in the 2 spatial problems. The results imply that rats trained on a spatial discrimination do not learn to attend to all spatial landmarks but only to those that serve to differentiate S+ and S-.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12735278     DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.2.143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  8 in total

1.  Modulation of attention in discrimination learning: the roles of stimulus relevance and stimulus-outcome correlation.

Authors:  Metin Uengoer; Harald Lachnit
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Changes in attention to relevant and irrelevant stimuli during spatial learning.

Authors:  Steven F Cuell; Mark A Good; Jemma C Dopson; John M Pearce; Murray R Horne
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2012-05-28

3.  Previous Experience Seems Crucial to Eliminate the Sex Gap in Geometry Learning When Solving a Navigation Task in Rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  Alejandra Aguilar-Latorre; Víctor Romera-Nicolás; Elisabet Gimeno; V D Chamizo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-09

4.  Association learning for emotional harbinger cues: when do previous emotional associations impair and when do they facilitate subsequent learning of new associations?

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Alexandra E Ycaza-Herrera; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2013-10-07

5.  Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Stephan Waldert; Ad Aertsen; Daniel M Wolpert; Carsten Mehring
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Asymmetry of attentional set in rhesus monkeys learning colour and shape discriminations.

Authors:  Mark G Baxter; David Gaffan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 7.  Structure learning in action.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Carsten Mehring; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Shape shifting: Local landmarks interfere with navigation by, and recognition of, global shape.

Authors:  Matthew G Buckley; Alastair D Smith; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.051

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.