Literature DB >> 17620021

Learning about environmental geometry: an associative model.

Noam Y Miller1, Sara J Shettleworth.   

Abstract

K. Cheng (1986) suggested that learning the geometry of enclosing surfaces takes place in a geometric module blind to other spatial information. Failures to find blocking or overshadowing of geometry learning by features near a goal seem consistent with this view. The authors present an operant model in which learning spatial features competes with geometry learning, as in the Rescorla-Wagner model. Relative total associative strength of cues at a location determines choice of that location and thus the frequencies of reward paired with each cue. The model shows how competitive learning of local features and geometry can appear to result in potentiation, blocking, or independence, depending on enclosure shape and kind of features. The model reproduces numerous findings from dry arenas and water mazes. ((c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17620021     DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.3.191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  39 in total

1.  Enclosure size and the use of local and global geometric cues for reorientation.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Martha R Forloines; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  Environmental Geometry Aligns the Hippocampal Map during Spatial Reorientation.

Authors:  Alex T Keinath; Joshua B Julian; Russell A Epstein; Isabel A Muzzio
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Encoding of variability of landmark-based spatial information.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-02-24

4.  A landmark blocks searching for a hidden platform in an environment with a distinctive shape after extended pretraining.

Authors:  Murray R Horne; John M Pearce
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Factors moderating blocking in human place learning: the role of task instructions.

Authors:  Oliver Hardt; Almut Hupbach; Lynn Nadel
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Spatial decisions and cognitive strategies of monkeys and humans based on abstract spatial stimuli in rotation test.

Authors:  Tereza Nekovarova; Jan Nedvidek; Daniel Klement; Jan Bures
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries.

Authors:  Christian F Doeller; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Ants in rectangular arenas: a support for the global matching theory.

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2009-09

Review 9.  What scatter-hoarding animals have taught us about small-scale navigation.

Authors:  Kristy L Gould; Debbie M Kelly; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: implications for theoretical accounts of spatial learning.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Michael F Brown; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.