Literature DB >> 20384405

Differences in the associability of relevant and irrelevant stimuli.

Jemma C Dopson1, Guillem R Esber, John M Pearce.   

Abstract

Pigeons in two experiments were first trained with a set of simple discriminations of the form AX+ CX-, BY+ DY- where A, B, C, and D were relevant, and belonged to one dimension, and X and Y were irrelevant and belonged to a different dimension. They were then tested with a discrimination of the form AX+ AY- BX-. The experiments revealed that the discrimination between AX+ and BX- was acquired more readily than between AX+ and AY-, which indicates that the original training resulted in the associability of the relevant stimuli being greater than that of the irrelevant stimuli. Experiment 2 revealed that the status of other stimuli from the two dimensions influenced these changes in associability. The associability of X and Y was enhanced by making other stimuli from the same dimension relevant, and the associability of A and B was reduced by making other stimuli from the same dimension irrelevant. The associability of the stimuli is attributed to the attention they are paid.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20384405     DOI: 10.1037/a0016588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  12 in total

1.  Stimuli that signal the absence of reinforcement are paid more attention than are irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  Jemma C Dopson; Natalie A Williams; Guillem R Esber; John M Pearce
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Changes in attention to an irrelevant cue that accompanies a negative patterning [corrected] discrimination.

Authors:  Jemma C Dopson; Guillem R Esber; John M Pearce
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 3.  Not-so-social learning strategies.

Authors:  Cecilia Heyes; John M Pearce
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Special issue on computational models of classical conditioning guest editors' introduction.

Authors:  Eduardo Alonso; Nestor Schmajuk
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  A configural theory of attention and associative learning.

Authors:  David N George; John M Pearce
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Solving Pavlov's puzzle: attentional, associative, and flexible configural mechanisms in classical conditioning.

Authors:  Munir G Kutlu; Nestor A Schmajuk
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Transfer of absolute and relative predictiveness in human contingency learning.

Authors:  Florian Kattner
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Changes in attention to relevant and irrelevant stimuli during spatial learning.

Authors:  Steven F Cuell; Mark A Good; Jemma C Dopson; John M Pearce; Murray R Horne
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2012-05-28

9.  The cost of selective attention in category learning: developmental differences between adults and infants.

Authors:  Catherine A Best; Hyungwook Yim; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2013-06-14

10.  Modeling attention in associative learning: two processes or one?

Authors:  M E Le Pelley; Mark Haselgrove; Guillem R Esber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.