| Literature DB >> 22605969 |
Jaciana S Aguiar1, Rosilma O Araújo1, Maria Do Desterro Rodrigues1, Kêsia X F R Sena1, André M Batista2, Maria M P Guerra2, Steno L Oliveira3, Josean F Tavares3, Marcelo S Silva3, Silene C Nascimento1, Teresinha Gonçalves Da Silva1.
Abstract
In the study, we have examined the antitumor and antimicrobial activities of the methanol extract, the fractions, a fraction of total alkaloids and two alkaloids isolated from the stem of Erythroxylum caatingae Plowman. All test fractions, except the hexane fractions, showed antimicrobial activity on gram-positive bacteria and fungi. The acetate: methanol (95:5), acetate, chloroform and hexane fractions show the highest cytotoxicity activity against the NCI-H292, HEp-2 and K562 cell lines using MTT. The absence of hemolysis in the erythrocytes of mice was observed in these fractions and 6β-Benzoyloxy-3α-(3,4,5- trimethoxybenzoyloxy) tropane (catuabine B). Staining with Annexin V-FITC and JC-1 was used to verify the mechanism of action of the compounds of E. caatingae that showed cytotoxicity less than 30 μg/mL in leukemic cells. After 48 h of incubation, we observed that the acetate: methanol (95:5), acetate, and chloroform fractions, as well as the catuabine B, increased in the number of cells in early apoptosis, from 53.0 to 74.8%. An analysis of the potential of the mitochondrial membrane by incorporation of JC-1 showed that most cells during incubation of the acetate: methanol (95:5) and acetate fractions (63.85 and 59.2%) were stained, suggesting the involvement of an intrinsic pathway of apoptosis.Entities:
Keywords: Erythroxylum caatingae; antimicrobial activity; apoptosis; cytotoxic activity; hemolytic activity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22605969 PMCID: PMC3344205 DOI: 10.3390/ijms13044124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Antimicrobial activity of the methanol extract of the stem of Erythroxylum caatingae and of its fractions (2000 μg/disc).
| Zone of Inhibition (mm) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microorganisms | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Kanamicin (30 μg/disc) | ketoconazole (300 μg/disc) |
| 10.5 ± 0.7 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 11.0 ± 0.7 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 | 10.5 ± 0.7 | 0.0 | 28 | - | |
| 21.5 ± 2.1 | 26.0 ± 1.4 | 28.5 ± 0.7 | 28.5 ± 0.7 | 29.5 ± 0.7 | 13.5 ± 0.7 | 26.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 | 34 | - | |
| 10.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 13.5 ± 0.7 | 13.5 ± 0.7 | 13.0 ± 0.7 | 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 | 29 | - | |
| 14.0 ± 1.4 | 22.5 ± 0.7 | 30.0 ± 0.0 | 31.5 ± 1.4 | 30.0 ± 0.0 | 15.0 ± 0.0 | 15.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 | 40 | - | |
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 11.5 ± 0.7 | 11.5 ± 0.7 | 12.5 ± 0.7 | 0.0 | 17.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 | 13 | - | |
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 15 | - | |
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 15 | - | |
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 20 | - | |
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 19.0 ± 1.4 | 19.0 ± 1.4 | 18.0 ± 1.4 | 0.0 | 18.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 24 | |
1: Methanol extract of stem of E. caatingae (MEEC); 2: AcOEt:MeOH (60:40); 3: AcOEt:MeOH (80:20); 4: AcOEt:MeOH (90:10); 5: AcOEt:MeOH (95:5); 6: AcOEt; 7: CHCl3; 8: Hexane fraction. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of two independent experiments. Each experiment was done in triplicate.
Evaluates the minimum bacteriostatic concentration of the methanol extract of the stem of Erythroxylum caatingae and of its fractions.
| Microorganisms | Minimum Bacteriostatic Concentration (μg/mL) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | 1000 | 500 | n.t. | n.t. | |
| 250 | 500 | n.t. | <31.25 | <31.25 | >2000 | <31.25 | |
| n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | 1000 | 500 | n.t. | 250 | |
| 1000 | 1000 | n.t. | 500 | 250 | 1,000 | 250 | |
| n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | 1000 | n.t. | 1000 | |
| n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | 500 | 500 | n.t. | 250 | |
1: Methanol extract of stem of E. caatingae (MEEC); 2: AcOEt:MeOH (60:40); 3: AcOEt:MeOH (80:20); 4: AcOEt:MeOH (90:10); 5: AcOEt:MeOH (95:5); 6: AcOEt; 7: CHCl3; n.t.: not tested. Each experiment was done in triplicate.
Cytotoxic and hemolytic activity de Erytroxylum caatingae.
| Products/Extracts | Cell Line, IC50 (μg/mL) | EC50 (μg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEp-2 | NCI-H292 | K562 | ||
| >50 | >50 | >50 | n.t. | |
| >50 | >50 | >50 | n.t. | |
| >50 | 25.76 ± 1.71 | >50 | >2000 | |
| >50 | 25.50 ± 1.08 | >50 | >2000 | |
| 40.59 ± 0.72 | 28.19 ± 2.09 | 13.10 ± 0.63 | >2000 | |
| 34.12 ± 1.01 | 20.37 ± 0.75 | 9.86 ± 0.56 | 403.24 ± 9.64 | |
| 8.25 ± 0.36 | 34.39 ± 1.71 | 11.21 ± 0.46 | 1036.52 ± 35.17 | |
| 31.42 ± 1.01 | 15.79 ± 1.01 | 33.58 ± 1.33 | 510.00 ± 8.60 | |
| >50 | >50 | >50 | n.t. | |
| >50 | >50 | 9.36 ± 0.77 | >250 | |
| >50 | >50 | >50 | n.t. | |
| 6.10 ± 0.19 | 2.75 ± 0.10 | 4.48 ± 0.23 | n.t. | |
1: Methanol extract of stem of E. caatingae (MEEC); 2: AcOEt:MeOH (40:60); 3: AcOEt:MeOH (80:20); 4: AcOEt:MeOH (90:10); 5: AcOEt:MeOH (95:5); 6: acetate fraction (AcOEt); 7: chloroform fraction (CHCl3); 8: hexane fraction (C6H6); 9: Fraction total of alkaloids; 10: catuabine B; 11: 3α,6β-dibenzoyloxytropane; n.t.: not tested. The IC50 and EC50 and its 95% confidence interval (CI 95%) were obtained by non-linear regression. Data are presented as mean ± SD of two independent experiments. Each experiment was done in triplicate.
Figure 1Effect of AcOEt:MeOH (95:5) (5), AcOEt (6), CHCl3 (7) and Catuabine B (10) in K562 cell population determined by fluorescence microscopy using Annexin V—FITC Kit, after 48 h incubation. The negative control (C) was the vehicle used for diluting the tested substances. Etoposide (E) was used as positive control. * p < 0.01 compared to control by ANOVA, followed by Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test. Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments.
Figure 2AnnV/PI staining of the cells. An image of K562 showing: (A) viable (AnnVneg/PIneg); (B) early apoptotic (AnnVpos/PIneg); (C) late apoptotic (AnnVpos/PIpos) and (D) necrotic (AnnVneg/PIpos) cell.
Figure 3Effect of AcOEt:MeOH (95:5) (5), AcOEt (6), CHCl3 (7) and catuabine B (10) in K562 cell population determined by fluorescence microscopy using JC-1, after 48 h incubation. The negative control (C) was the vehicle used for diluting the tested substances. Etoposide (E) was used as positive control. * p < 0.01 compared to control by ANOVA, followed by Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test. Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments.
Figure 4JC-1 staining of the cells. An image of K562 showing: (A) Green fluorescence emitted by cells is attributed to depolarized mitochondrial membrane; (B) No depolarized mitochondrial membrane emits red fluorescence.
Evaluates the minimum inhibitory concentration of the methanol extract of the stem of Erythroxylum caatingae and of its fractions.
| Microorganisms | Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (μg/mL) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | 250 | 250 | n.t. | n.t. | |
| 250 | 250 | n.t. | <31.25 | <31.25 | 250 | <31.25 | |
| n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | 250 | 250 | n.t. | 125 | |
| 500 | 500 | n.t. | 125 | 125 | 1000 | 125 | |
| n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | 500 | n.t. | 500 | |
| n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | 250 | 125 | n.t. | 125 | |
1: Methanol extract of stem of E. caatingae (MEEC); 2: AcOEt:MeOH (60:40); 3: AcOEt:MeOH (80:20); 4: AcOEt:MeOH (90:10); 5: AcOEt:MeOH (95:5); 6: AcOEt; 7: CHCl3; n.t.: not tested. Each experiment was done in triplicate.