| Literature DB >> 21845072 |
Milan S Stankovic1, Milena G Curcic, Jovana B Zizic, Marina D Topuzovic, Slavica R Solujic, Snezana D Markovic.
Abstract
This study deals with total phenolic content, antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity of methanolic extracts from different Teucrium species and the effect on the prooxidant/antioxidant status in HCT-116 cells. The total phenolic content of the extracts was measured spectrophotometricaly and the obtained results ranged from 56.62 mg/g to 172.50 mg GA/g. The antiproliferative activity of methanolic extracts from different Teucrium species was determined using MTT cell viability assay, where IC(50) value was used as a parameter for cytotoxicity. The type of cell death was explored by fluorescence microscopy using the acridin orange/ethidium bromide method. MTT assay showed that all extracts significantly reduced cell viability in a dose-dependent manner, with very low IC(50) values. The highest content of phenolic compounds and the best cytotoxic activity on HCT-116 cells after 24 h of exposure was in T. chamaedrys extract, with IC(50) values of 5.48 × 10(-9) μg/mL. After 72 h, methanolic extract of T. arduini appeared to have the best cytotoxic activity on HCT-116, with IC(50) values of 0.37 μg/mL. Treatments caused typical apoptotic morphological changes in HCT-116 cells and showed a high percentage of apoptotic cells. The results of the presented research indicate that some Teucrium extracts are a very rich source of phenols, which may directly contribute to high antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity.Entities:
Keywords: MTT assay; Teucrium; acridin orange/ethidium bromide assay; antioxidants; antiprolifertative activity; phenols
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21845072 PMCID: PMC3155345 DOI: 10.3390/ijms12074190
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Total phenolic contents 1 in the extracts in terms of gallic acid equivalent (mg of GA/g of extract).
| Plant Species | Total Phenolic Content |
|---|---|
| 172.50 ± 1.26 | |
| 169.06 ± 0.75 | |
| 124.62 ± 1.05 | |
| 90.39 ± 1.19 | |
| 178.20 ± 1.11 | |
| 186.02 ± 0.91 | |
| 56.62 ± 0.99 |
All values are mean ± SEM, n = 3.
Figure 1The dose-response curves of the effects of Teucrium chamaedrys, T. montanum, T. polium, T. arduini, T. scordium subsp. scordium, T. scordium subsp. scordioides and T. botrys on cell growth in HCT-116 cells. The cells were treated with various concentrations of drugs, after 24 h and 72 h of exposure. The antiproliferative effects were measured by MTT assay. Results were expressed as means ± SEM for three independent determinations.
Growth inhibitory effects—IC50 values (μg/mL) of methanolic extracts of different Teucrium species—on HCT-116 cell line after 24 h and 72 h of exposure.
| Plant Species | IC50 μg/mL
| |
|---|---|---|
| After 24 h | After 72 h | |
| 5.48 × 10−9 ± 0.012 | 190.07 ± 3.28 | |
| 1.08 × 10−5 ± 0.28 | 75.73 ± 2.71 | |
| 77.83 ± 0.41 | 253.39 ± 1.61 | |
| 114.16 ± 0.26 | 0.37 ± 0.043 | |
| 17.04 ± 0.47 | 59.02 ± 0.58 | |
| 143.46 ± 1.25 | 72.83 ± 1.56 | |
| 116.38 ± 2.89 | 183.15 ± 3.15 | |
All values are mean ± SEM, n = 3.
Different values of viable, apoptotic and necrotic cells as percentage of all cells measured by AO/EB fluorescence staining, after treatment by 250 μg/mL of metanolic extracts from different Teucrium species. The percentages of cells were measured after 24 h of treatment.
| Plant Species | Viable Cells | Early Apoptotic Cells | Late Apoptotic Cells | Necrotic Cells |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| control cells | 96.35% | 3.19% | - | - |
| 3.04% | 55.65% | 38.26% | 3.04% | |
| 1.72% | 54.02% | 37.93% | 6.32% | |
| 0.91% | 36.52% | 50.23% | 12.33% | |
| 1.29% | 40.64% | 47.09% | 10.96% | |
| 0.72% | 48.55% | 44.20% | 6.52% | |
| 0.85% | 40.17% | 40.17% | 18.80% | |
| 52.49% | 47.51% | - | - |
Figure 2AO/EB staining of HCT-116 cells to detect apoptosis and necrosis induced by 250 μg/mL methanolic extracts from T. chamaedrys (2), T. montanum (3), T. polium (4), T. arduini (5), T. scordium subsp. scordium (6), T. scordium subsp. scordioides (7) and T. botrys (8) after 24 h of exposure. Untreated cells were observed as control cells (1). The images of cells were taken with a fluorescence microscope at 400×.
Effect of methanolic extracts from different Teucrium species, on HCT-116 cell line after 24 h and 72 h of exposure, on superoxide anion radical (O2−) production expressed as μmol/mL of cells.
| Plant Species | 0 μg/mL | 50 μg/mL | 250 μg/mL | 500 μg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| After 24 h | ||||
| 38.28 ± 0.46 | 40.73 ± 0.24 | 39.22 ± 0.38 | 39.42 ± 0.20 | |
| 38.28 ± 0.46 | 40.63 ± 0.14 | 38.73 ± 0.71 | 39.48 ± 0.12 | |
| 38.28 ± 0.46 | 40.24 ± 0.36 | 38.73 ± 0.19 | 39.58 ± 0.33 | |
| 38.28 ± 0.46 | 40.43 ± 0.18 | 39.56 ± 0.20 | 39.37 ± 0.19 | |
| 38.28 ± 0.46 | 41.76 ± 0.87 | 39.8 ± 0.19 | 38.94 ± 0.09 | |
| 38.28 ± 0.46 | 40.63 ± 0.09 | 40.21 ± 0.19 | 40.13 ± 0.16 | |
| 38.28 ± 0.46 | 41.55 ± 0.16 | 40.6 ± 0.22 | 39.49 ± 0.20 | |
| 5.35 ± 0.24 | 5.76 ± 0.26 | 5.91 ± 0.16 | 5.15 ± 0.21 | |
| 5.35 ± 0.24 | 5.39 ± 0.21 | 5.48 ± 0.15 | 5.19 ± 0.16 | |
| 5.35 ± 0.24 | 5.43 ± 0.22 | 5.06 ± 0.13 | 5.07 ± 0.21 | |
| 5.35 ± 0.24 | 5.78 ± 0.16 | 5.69 ± 0.18 | 5.82 ± 0.56 | |
| 5.35 ± 0.24 | 5.58 ± 0.19 | 5.84 ± 0.23 | 5.88 ± 0.45 | |
| 5.35 ± 0.24 | 5.47 ± 0.21 | 5.21 ± 0.27 | 6.24 ± 0.21 | |
| 5.35 ± 0.24 | 5.96 ± 0.15 | 5.35 ± 0.18 | 5.89 ± 0.34 | |
All values are mean ± SEM, n = 3.
p < 0.05 as compared with control and
p < 0.05 after 24 h and 72 h of treatment.
Effect of methanolic extracts from different Teucrium species, on HCT-116 cell line after 24 h and 72 h of exposure, on the nitrite (NO2−) production expressed as nmol/mL of cells.
| Plant species | 0 μg/mL | 50 μg/mL | 250 μg/mL | 500 μg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| After 24 h | ||||
| 12.36 ± 0.99 | 3.3 ± 0.68 | 1.77 ± 0.21 | 4.15 ± 0.43 | |
| 12.36 ± 0.99 | 11.06 ± 3.94 | 1.46 ± 0.55 | 1.18 ± 0.42 | |
| 12.36 ± 0.99 | 5.78 ± 1.55 | 3.24 ± 1.01 | 1.21 ± 0.52 | |
| 12.36 ± 0.99 | 15.44 ± 4.42 | 3.79 ± 1.4 | 9.91 ± 3.46 | |
| 12.36 ± 0.99 | 2.2 ± 0.31 | 2.32 ± 0.89 | 2.09 ± 0.19 | |
| 12.36 ± 0.99 | 14.29 ± 6.66 | 7.34 ± 2.76 | 11.17 ± 5.16 | |
| 12.36 ± 0.99 | 10.83 ± 2.83 | 4.98 ± 1.69 | 2.57 ± 0.37 | |
| 3.23 ± 0.73 | 0.36 ± 0.36 | 1.09 ± 0.38 | 0.98 ± 0.32 | |
| 3.23 ± 0.73 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.08 | 0.81 ± 0.38 | |
| 3.23 ± 0.73 | 1.56 ± 1.27 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.23 ± 0.23 | |
| 3.23 ± 0.73 | 0.3 ± 0.3 | 0.15 ± 0.15 | 2.43 ± 0.77 | |
| 3.23 ± 0.73 | 2.08 ± 1.63 | 1.12 ± 0.53 | 0.39 ± 0.39 | |
| 3.23 ± 0.73 | 3.5 ± 0.76 | 1.59 ± 0.56 | 3.59 ± 0.17 | |
| 3.23 ± 0.73 | 0.59 ± 0.49 | 2.4 ± 0.81 | 1.34 ± 0.59 | |
All values are mean ± SEM, n = 3;
p < 0.05 as compared with control and
p < 0.05 after 24 h and 72 h of treatment.