Literature DB >> 2259978

Influence of bone mineral density on the fixation of thoracolumbar implants. A comparative study of transpedicular screws, laminar hooks, and spinous process wires.

J D Coe1, K E Warden, M A Herzig, P C McAfee.   

Abstract

Posteriorly directed load to failure testing of four different types of spinal implants was performed in individual T5 to S1 vertebra harvested from seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric spines. The implants tested were: 1) Drummond spinous process wires, 2) Harrington laminar hooks, 3) Cotrel-Dubousset transpedicular screws, and 4) Steffee VSP transpedicular screws. The ultimate failure of each implant was compared with the bone mineral density of each vertebra to determine which implants, if any, were particularly advantageous in osteoporotic vertebrae. Before biomechanical testing, the spines were analyzed in vitro by dual photon absorptiometry to determine the bone mineral densities (gm/cm2) of each vertebra. The mean tensile loads to failure for each of the implants tested were as follows: Cotrel-Dubousset transpedicular screws: 345 Newtons; spinous process wire/button: 382 Newtons; Steffee transpedicular screws: 430 Newtons; and laminar hooks: 646 Newtons. The difference between the loads to failure for laminar hooks and the other implants was significant (P less than 0.05) using one-way analysis of variance. The overall correlation coefficient for bone mineral density with ultimate load to failure was 0.30 (P less than 0.001). The correlation coefficients were 0.47 (P less than 0.001) for spinous process wires alone; 0.096 (not significant) for laminar hooks alone; 0.37 (P less than 0.001) for Cotrel-Dubousset pedicle screws; and 0.48 (P less than 0.001) for Steffee pedicle screws. Of the four different implants tested, laminar hooks were most resistant to failure from posteriorly directed forces.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2259978     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199009000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  45 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of a bipedicular spinal fixation device: three different strength tests.

Authors:  Laurent Balabaud; Emeric Gallard; Wafa Skalli; Bernard Dupas; Robert Roger; François Lavaste; Jean-Paul Steib
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-04-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Thoracic spine fractures: injury profile and outcomes of a surgically treated cohort.

Authors:  Bartolomé Marré; Vicente Ballesteros; Celmira Martínez; Juan J Zamorano; Francisco Ilabaca; Milan Munjin; Ratko Yurac; Alejandro Urzúa; Miguel Lecaros; José Fleiderman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A history of spine biomechanics. Focus on 20th century progress.

Authors:  T R Oxland
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Accuracy of DXA scanning of the thoracic spine: cadaveric studies comparing BMC, areal BMD and geometric estimates of volumetric BMD against ash weight and CT measures of bone volume.

Authors:  Meena M Sran; Karim M Khan; Kathy Keiver; Jason B Chew; Heather A McKay; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of an expansive pedicle screw in calf vertebrae.

Authors:  Wei Lei; Zixiang Wu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Insertion loads of the X STOP interspinous process distraction system designed to treat neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Vikram Talwar; Derek P Lindsey; Amy Fredrick; Ken Y Hsu; James F Zucherman; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  [Stabilization of the osteoporotic spine from a biomechanical viewpoint].

Authors:  C-E Heyde; A Rohlmann; U Weber; R Kayser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Use of the Universal Clamp for deformity correction and as an adjunct to fusion: preliminary results in scoliosis.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Jouve; Jérôme Sales de Gauzy; Benjamin Blondel; Franck Launay; Franck Accadbled; Gérard Bollini
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  Strategies of spinal fusion on osteoporotic spine.

Authors:  Sung Bae Park; Chun Kee Chung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-06-30

10.  The mechanical role of laminar hook protection of pedicle screws at the caudal end vertebra.

Authors:  J Y Margulies; R S Casar; S A Caruso; M G Neuwirth; T R Haher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.