Literature DB >> 15926059

Insertion loads of the X STOP interspinous process distraction system designed to treat neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Vikram Talwar1, Derek P Lindsey, Amy Fredrick, Ken Y Hsu, James F Zucherman, Scott A Yerby.   

Abstract

An interspinous process implant has been developed to treat patients suffering from neurogenic intermittent claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis. As most patients who suffer from spinal stenosis are over the age of 50 and may have weaker bones, it is imperative to know how bone mineral density (BMD) correlates with lateral spinous process strength. The study was undertaken to characterize the lateral failure loads of the spinous process, correlate the failure loads to BMD, and compare the failure loads to the loads required to insert an interspinous process implant. Spinous process lateral failure loads were assessed, correlated to BMD, and compared to the loads required to insert an interspinous process implant. Mean spinous process failure loads were significantly greater than the lateral insertion load of the interspinous process implant. There was a significant relationship between the BMD and spinous process failure load. The technique used to insert the interspinous implant poses little risk to spinous process failure. There is ample margin of safety between the insertion loads and spinous process failure loads. The significant relationship between BMD and spinous process failure load suggests that patients with lower BMD must be approached with more caution during the implant insertion procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15926059      PMCID: PMC3489454          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0891-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

Review 1.  Degenerative lumbar stenosis: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  A S Hilibrand; N Rand
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Influence of bone mineral density on the fixation of thoracolumbar implants. A comparative study of transpedicular screws, laminar hooks, and spinous process wires.

Authors:  J D Coe; K E Warden; M A Herzig; P C McAfee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  J N Katz; S J Lipson; M G Larson; J M McInnes; A H Fossel; M H Liang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  A C Simotas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical features, diagnostic procedures, and results of surgical treatment in 68 patients.

Authors:  S Hall; J D Bartleson; B M Onofrio; H L Baker; H Okazaki; J D O'Duffy
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Degenerative stenosis of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  D M Spengler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Chapter 16. Neurogenic intermittent claudication in cases with absolute and relative stenosis of the lumbar vertebral canal (ASLC and RSLC), in cases with narrow lumbar intervertebral foramina, and in cases with both entities.

Authors:  H Verbiest
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  1973

Review 8.  Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  R W Porter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features.

Authors:  T Amundsen; H Weber; F Lilleås; H J Nordal; M Abdelnoor; B Magnaes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Interspinous process segmental spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  D Drummond; J Guadagni; J S Keene; A Breed; R Narechania
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.324

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Role of lumbar interspinous distraction on the neural elements.

Authors:  Alex Alfieri; Roberto Gazzeri; Julian Prell; Christian Scheller; Jens Rachinger; Christian Strauss; Andreas Schwarz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  [Longterm results of the interspinous spacer X-STOP].

Authors:  A Reinhardt; S Hufnagel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Computed tomography measurements of the lumbar spinous processes and interspinous space.

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Timmo Koy; Marc Röllinghoff; Jan Siewe; Thomas Kreitz; Daniel Müller; Christopher Bangard; Peer Eysel
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Posterior vertebral arch cement augmentation (spinoplasty) to prevent fracture of spinous processes after interspinous spacer implant.

Authors:  G Bonaldi; G Bertolini; A Marrocu; A Cianfoni
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  The Felix-trial. Double-blind randomization of interspinous implant or bony decompression for treatment of spinal stenosis related intermittent neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  Wouter A Moojen; Mark P Arts; Ronald Brand; Bart W Koes; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Interspinous process spacers versus traditional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Prashanth J Rao; Jonathon R Ball; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03

7.  Clinical outcomes of a polyaxial interspinous fusion system.

Authors:  Joseph A Sclafani; Kevin Liang; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Charles Gordon
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wouter A Moojen; Mark P Arts; Wilco C H Jacobs; Erik W van Zwet; M Elske van den Akker-van Marle; Bart W Koes; Carmen L A M Vleggeert-Lankamp; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-11-14

Review 9.  Controversies about interspinous process devices in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Roberto Gazzeri; Marcelo Galarza; Alex Alfieri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  One-year follow-up of a series of 100 patients treated for lumbar spinal canal stenosis by means of HeliFix interspinous process decompression device.

Authors:  Alberto Alexandre; Andrea Maria Alexandre; Mario De Pretto; Luca Corò; Raul Saggini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.