Literature DB >> 15864667

Biomechanical evaluation of an expansive pedicle screw in calf vertebrae.

Wei Lei1, Zixiang Wu.   

Abstract

The main objective of the present study is to evaluate biomechanically a newly designed expansive pedicle screw (EPS) using fresh pedicles from calf lumber vertebrae in comparison with conventional pedicle screws, (CDH) CD Horizon, Universal Spine System pedicle screw (USS) and Tenor (Sofamor Denek). Pull-out and turning-back tests were performed on these pedicle screws to compare their holding strength. Additionally, revision tests were undertaken to evaluate the mechanical properties of EPS as a "rescue" revision screw. A fatigue simulation test using a perpendicular load up to 1,500,000 cycles was also carried out. The results showed that the turning back torque (Tmax) and pull-out force (Fmax) of EPS screws were significantly greater than those of USS, Tenor and CDH screws (6.5x40 mm). In revision tests, the Fmax of both types of EPS screws (6.5x40 mm; 7.0x40 mm) were significantly greater than that of CDH, USS, and Tenor screws (P<0.05). Furthermore, no screws were broken or bent at the end of fatigue tests. The findings from the current study suggest that expansive pedicle screws can significantly improve the bone purchase and the pull-out strength compared to USS, Tenor and CDH screws of similar dimensions before and after a failure simulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15864667      PMCID: PMC3489295          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0867-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  36 in total

1.  Restoration of pedicle screw fixation with an in situ setting calcium phosphate cement.

Authors:  D C Moore; R S Maitra; L A Farjo; G P Graziano; S A Goldstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Augmentation of anterior vertebral body screw fixation by an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute.

Authors:  B Bai; F J Kummer; J Spivak
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Increased pedicle screw pullout strength with vertebroplasty augmentation in osteoporotic spines.

Authors:  John S Sarzier; Avery J Evans; David W Cahill
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities: are they really safe?

Authors:  S I Suk; W J Kim; S M Lee; J H Kim; E R Chung
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A 10-year follow-up evaluation of lumbar spine fusion with pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  John Glaser; Mark Stanley; Hutha Sayre; Joyce Woody; Ernest Found; Kevin Spratt
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Lumbar pedicle screw salvage: pullout testing of three different pedicle screw designs.

Authors:  R F McLain; M F Fry; T A Moseley; N A Sharkey
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1995-02

7.  Enhancement of pedicle screw stability using calcium phosphate cement in osteoporotic vertebrae: in vivo biomechanical study.

Authors:  Yoshimichi Taniwaki; Ryuichi Takemasa; Toshikazu Tani; Hiroo Mizobuchi; Hiroshi Yamamoto
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.601

8.  Influence of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation: a study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients.

Authors:  K Okuyama; E Abe; T Suzuki; Y Tamura; M Chiba; K Sato
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation strength using an injectable calcium phosphate cement as a function of injection timing and method.

Authors:  Susan M Renner; Tae-Hong Lim; Whoan-Jeang Kim; Leonid Katolik; Howard S An; Gunnar B J Andersson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A biomechanical comparison of calf versus cadaver lumbar spine models.

Authors:  Lee H Riley; Jason C Eck; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Young Do Koh; Jae Won You; Tae-Hong Lim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  16 in total

1.  Pullout strength of pedicle screws with cement augmentation in severe osteoporosis: a comparative study between cannulated screws with cement injection and solid screws with cement pre-filling.

Authors:  Lih-Huei Chen; Ching-Lung Tai; De-Mei Lee; Po-Liang Lai; Yen-Chen Lee; Chi-Chien Niu; Wen-Jer Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Biomechanical and histological evaluation of an expandable pedicle screw in osteoporotic spine in sheep.

Authors:  Shiyong Wan; Wei Lei; Zixiang Wu; Da Liu; Mingxuan Gao; Suochao Fu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The sacral screw placement depending on morphological and anatomical peculiarities.

Authors:  Carolin Meyer; Peter Pfannebecker; Jan Siewe; David Grevenstein; Jan Bredow; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Serious complication of cement augmentation for damaged pilot hole.

Authors:  Moon Young Jung; Dong Ah Shin; In Bo Hahn; Tae Gon Kim; Ryoong Huh; Sang Sup Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation device for the thoracic spine.

Authors:  Michio Hongo; Brice Ilharreborde; Ralph E Gay; Chunfeng Zhao; Kristin D Zhao; Lawrence J Berglund; Mark Zobitz; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Balancing rigidity and safety of pedicle screw fixation via a novel expansion mechanism in a severely osteoporotic model.

Authors:  Thomas M Shea; James J Doulgeris; Sabrina A Gonzalez-Blohm; William E Lee; Kamran Aghayev; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  In vitro biomechanical study of pedicle screw pull-out strength based on different screw path preparation techniques.

Authors:  Mark Moldavsky; Kanaan Salloum; Brandon Bucklen; Saif Khalil; Jwalant S Mehta
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans.

Authors:  Sun-Ren Sheng; Hua-Zi Xu; Yong-Li Wang; Qing-An Zhu; Fang-Min Mao; Yan Lin; Xiang-Yang Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of expansive pedicle screw and polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw in osteoporotic sheep lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical and interfacial evaluations.

Authors:  Da Liu; Yi Zhang; Bo Zhang; Qing-yun Xie; Cai-ru Wang; Jin-biao Liu; Dong-fa Liao; Kai Jiang; Wei Lei; Xian-ming Pan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Designs and techniques that improve the pullout strength of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: current status.

Authors:  Thomas M Shea; Jake Laun; Sabrina A Gonzalez-Blohm; James J Doulgeris; William E Lee; Kamran Aghayev; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.