Literature DB >> 12687438

Biomechanical evaluation of a bipedicular spinal fixation device: three different strength tests.

Laurent Balabaud1, Emeric Gallard, Wafa Skalli, Bernard Dupas, Robert Roger, François Lavaste, Jean-Paul Steib.   

Abstract

Disadvantages of thoracic posterior implants and developments in rod contouring in situ led to the design of a new spinal implant: the bipedicular spinal fixation device (BSF). The BSF is composed of two bifid hooks linked by a compression transverse connector and inserted into the costo-vertebral and costo-transverse joints. The aim of this biomechanical study was to determine the loading tolerance of the BSF. Three strength tests-a pull-out test, a lateral load-to-failure test and a uniaxial transversal compression test to failure-were performed using six human thoracic spines on an Instron testing device. Specimen evaluation consisted of: bone mineral density (BMD) measurement with the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) technique, cortical thickness measurements and a morphometric study. The mean values for load-to-failure in the posterior and lateral tests were 324 N and 400 N respectively. The mean value of the uniaxial compression was 988 N. The mean BMD estimated by DEXA was 0.557 g/cm(2). The BSF loading tolerance was compatible with the in situ rod contouring technique requirements when we considered posterior and lateral pull-out tests. The transversal compression test determined the appropriate and efficient BSF tightening force.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12687438      PMCID: PMC3468004          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-002-0520-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  22 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of a bipedicular spinal fixation system: a comparative stiffness test.

Authors:  Laurent Balabaud; Emeric Gallard; Wafa Skalli; Jean-Pierre Lassau; François Lavaste; Jean-Paul Steib
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation.

Authors:  P R HARRINGTON
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  A biomechanical study of anterior thoracolumbar screw fixation.

Authors:  S W Breeze; B J Doherty; P S Noble; A LeBlanc; M H Heggeness
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Biomechanics of in situ rod contouring of short-segment pedicle screw instrumentation in the thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  M J Voor; C S Roberts; S M Rose; S D Glassman
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1997-04

5.  Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles.

Authors:  M R Zindrick; L L Wiltse; A Doornik; E H Widell; G W Knight; A G Patwardhan; J C Thomas; S L Rothman; B T Fields
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A morphometric study of human lumbar and selected thoracic vertebrae.

Authors:  J L Berry; J M Moran; W S Berg; A D Steffee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Morphometry of the thoracic and lumbar spine related to transpedicular screw placement for surgical spinal fixation.

Authors:  M H Krag; D L Weaver; B D Beynnon; L D Haugh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  [Osteosynthesis of dorsal, lumbar, and lumbosacral spine with metallic plates screwed into vertebral pedicles and articular apophyses].

Authors:  R Roy-Camille; M Roy-Camille; C Demeulenaere
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 1.228

9.  The anatomic basis and development of segmental spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  E R Luque
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  [A new technic for segmental spinal osteosynthesis using the posterior approach].

Authors:  Y Cotrel; J Dubousset
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1984
View more
  2 in total

1.  Our experience and early results with a complementary implant for the correction of major thoracic curves.

Authors:  Zoltán Csernátony; László Kiss; Sándor Manó; Zsolt Hunya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A pedicle screw system and a lamina hook system provide similar primary and long-term stability: a biomechanical in vitro study with quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Dominik Kaiser; David Volkheimer; Carsten Hackenbroch; Klaus Püschel; Michael Rauschmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.