Literature DB >> 20358324

[Stabilization of the osteoporotic spine from a biomechanical viewpoint].

C-E Heyde1, A Rohlmann, U Weber, R Kayser.   

Abstract

The altered trabecular structure of the osteoporotic spine leads to an increased vulnerability of its biomechanical characteristics and reduction of load resistance. Therefore, any surgical procedure must account for these circumstances. In cement-augmented vertebrae, both the overall stability and load transfer to the adjacent structures are influenced by a variety of factors. This has been demonstrated by different findings regarding volume, special characteristics, choice of approach and application, as well as distribution of the cement within the vertebral body. Independent of the well-known good clinical results, these features leave the discussion regarding the most appropriate form of cement-augmenting technique open. In cases where implants are required, there are increasing data to allow for an appropriate choice of stabilizing devices to fit the biomechanical demands in poor bone quality. Thereby, multilevel instrumentation, additive stabilization techniques, cement-augmented pedicle screws and adapted implant designs ensure and increase patient safety. However, regardless of the procedure chosen to stabilize the osteoporotic spine, reconstruction of the column profile appears to be of pre-eminent importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20358324     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-009-1574-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  68 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation and preliminary clinical experience with an expansive pedicle screw design.

Authors:  S D Cook; S L Salkeld; T S Whitecloud; J Barbera
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-06

2.  Axial and tangential fixation strength of pedicle screws versus hooks in the thoracic spine in relation to bone mineral density.

Authors:  Lars Hackenberg; Thomas Link; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  A comparison of pullout strength for pedicle screws of different designs: a study using tapped and untapped pilot holes.

Authors:  Ferris M Pfeiffer; Dennis L Abernathie; Douglas E Smith
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  The vertebral fracture cascade in osteoporosis: a review of aetiopathogenesis.

Authors:  A M Briggs; A M Greig; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Clinical consequences of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  P D Ross
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-08-18       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  An experimental study of a combination method using a pedicle screw and laminar hook for the osteoporotic spine.

Authors:  K Hasegawa; H E Takahashi; S Uchiyama; T Hirano; T Hara; T Washio; T Sugiura; M Youkaichiya; M Ikeda
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Posterior spinal shortening for paraplegia after vertebral collapse caused by osteoporosis.

Authors:  K Saita; Y Hoshino; I Kikkawa; H Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The effect of cement augmentation on the load transfer in an osteoporotic functional spinal unit: finite-element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Lutz Peter Nolte; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Suitability of a calcium phosphate cement in osteoporotic vertebral body fracture augmentation: a controlled, randomized, clinical trial of balloon kyphoplasty comparing calcium phosphate versus polymethylmethacrylate.

Authors:  Thomas R Blattert; Leonie Jestaedt; Arnulf Weckbach
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Vertebral dimensions as risk factor of vertebral fracture in osteoporotic patients: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  A Ruyssen-Witrand; L Gossec; S Kolta; M Dougados; C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Osteoporotic vertebral body fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: indications and techniques of a 360°-stabilization.

Authors:  Ulrich Spiegl; J-S Jarvers; C-E Heyde; C Josten
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  [Osteoporotic vertebral body fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Diagnostics and therapeutic strategies].

Authors:  C Josten; C Schmidt; U Spiegl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  [Percutaneous stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures. Techniques of fracture reduction and spinal cord decompression].

Authors:  T Gühring; C Raible; S Matschke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  [Hounsfield units as a measure of bone density-applications in spine surgery].

Authors:  Max J Scheyerer; Bernhard Ullrich; Georg Osterhoff; Ulrich A Spiegl; Klaus J Schnake
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Functionalization of screw implants with superelastic structured Nitinol anchoring elements.

Authors:  Isabell Hamann; Stefan Schleifenbaum; Christian Rotsch; Welf-Guntram Drossel; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde; Mario Leimert
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.819

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.