Literature DB >> 22576929

Low early and late dislocation rates with 36- and 40-mm heads in patients at high risk for dislocation.

Paul F Lachiewicz1, Elizabeth S Soileau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Large (36- and 40-mm) femoral heads with highly crosslinked polyethylene liners were introduced to reduce the risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), but it is unclear whether the risk is reduced and whether there is osteolysis or liner fracture. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined (1) the incidence of early and late (> 5 years) dislocation; (2) the rate of femoral and acetabular component loosening and revision; and (3) the rate of liner fracture and pelvic osteolysis.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 112 patients presumed at high risk for dislocation who had 122 primary THAs: 108 with 36-mm and 14 with 40-mm femoral heads. The risk factors were: age > 75 years (80 hips); proximal femur fracture (18); history of contralateral dislocation (two); history of alcohol abuse (two); large acetabulum > 60 mm (six); and other (14). Patients were evaluated for early (< 1 year) and late (> 5 years) dislocation; rate of reoperation; clinical result with Harris hip score; and standard radiographic analysis for radiolucent lines and osteolysis.
RESULTS: The rate of early dislocation was 4% (five of 122 hips), all with a 36-mm head. There were no late dislocations in 74 hips followed for 5 to 10 years, no revision for acetabular or femoral loosening, and no liner fractured. There were no hips with pelvic osteolysis and seven hips with an acetabular radiolucent line.
CONCLUSIONS: The 36- and 40-mm femoral heads were associated with a low risk of dislocation in high-risk patients undergoing primary THA with no osteolysis or liner fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of level of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22576929      PMCID: PMC3549174          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2379-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  22 in total

1.  The influence of patient-related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement.

Authors:  S A Paterno; P F Lachiewicz; S S Kelley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Stability of total hip arthroplasty in patients 75 years or older.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do.

Authors:  Roy D Crowninshield; William J Maloney; Douglas H Wentz; Steve M Humphrey; Cheryl R Blanchard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes.

Authors:  Brian R Burroughs; Brian Hallstrom; Gregory J Golladay; Daniel Hoeffel; William H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation.

Authors:  S S Kelley; P F Lachiewicz; J M Hickman; S M Paterno
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement.

Authors:  J G DeLee; J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration. An experimental study.

Authors:  P Massin; L Schmidt; C A Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Late dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marius von Knoch; Daniel J Berry; W Scott Harmsen; Bernard F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Treatment of pelvic osteolysis associated with a stable acetabular component inserted without cement as part of a total hip replacement.

Authors:  W J Maloney; P Herzwurm; W Paprosky; H E Rubash; C A Engh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  12 in total

1.  Choice of approach, but not femoral head size, affects revision rate due to dislocations in THA after femoral neck fracture: results from the Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Algimantas Cebatorius; Otto Robertsson; Justinas Stucinskas; Alfredas Smailys; Linas Leonas; Sarunas Tarasevicius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Do Complication Rates Differ by Gender After Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bryan D Haughom; Brandon J Erickson; Michael D Hellman; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Acetabular liner with focal constraint to prevent dislocation after THA.

Authors:  Jacob T Munro; Mihai H Vioreanu; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The influence of stem offset and neck shaft angles on the range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takeshi Shoji; Takuma Yamasaki; Soutarou Izumi; Susumu Hachisuka; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Low femoral antetorsion and total hip arthroplasty: a risk factor.

Authors:  Takeshi Shoji; Yuji Yasunaga; Takuma Yamasaki; Soutarou Izumi; Susumu Hachisuka; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Bony impingement depends on the bone morphology of the hip after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takeshi Shoji; Yuji Yasunaga; Takuma Yamasaki; Ryo Mori; Michio Hamanishi; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Constrained liners, dual mobility or large diameter heads to avoid dislocation in THA.

Authors:  Olivier Guyen
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13

8.  Hip stability after total hip arthroplasty predicted by intraoperative stability test and range of motion: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hiromasa Tanino; Tatsuya Sato; Yasuhiro Nishida; Ryo Mitsutake; Hiroshi Ito
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  Causes of and treatment options for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yian Lu; Haijun Xiao; Feng Xue
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  The minimal invasive direct anterior approach in combination with large heads in total hip arthroplasty - is dislocation still a major issue? a case control study.

Authors:  Steffen Hoell; Marius Sander; Georg Gosheger; Helmut Ahrens; Ralf Dieckmann; Gregor Hauschild
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.