Literature DB >> 9917601

Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation.

S S Kelley1, P F Lachiewicz, J M Hickman, S M Paterno.   

Abstract

Two clinical studies, one prospective randomized and one retrospective, were performed to evaluate the relationship of femoral head size and acetabular component outer diameter to the prevalence of dislocation of the modular total hip replacement. Between October 1995 and April 1996, 31 primary total hip arthroplasties in 30 patients were randomized to a femoral head diameter of 22 mm or 28 mm, for two groups of acetabular components of outer diameters of 56 mm or larger and 54 mm or smaller. Head size (22 mm) and acetabular component outer diameter (> or = 56 mm) were found to increase the risk of dislocation. From December 1984 to January 1994, 308 primary total hip arthroplasties were performed through a posterior approach by one surgeon using a modular 28 mm femoral head and one type of uncemented acetabular component. The rate of dislocation for acetabular components with an outer diameter of 62 mm or larger was increased significantly (five of 36 hips, 14%) compared with those with an outer diameter of 60 mm or smaller (11 of 272 hips, 4%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9917601     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199810000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  35 in total

1.  The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial?

Authors:  Donald S Garbuz; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Nelson V Greidanus; Eric R Bohm; Martin J Petrak; Craig J Della Valle; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Hip dislocation: are hip precautions necessary in anterior approaches?

Authors:  Camilo Restrepo; S M Javad Mortazavi; Justin Brothers; Javad Parvizi; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A critical analysis of radiographic factors in patients who develop dislocation after elective primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marion Opperer; Yuo-yu Lee; Francisco Nally; Alvaro Blanes Perez; Kaveh Goudarz-Mehdikhani; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years.

Authors:  Remi Philippot; Jean Philippe Camilleri; Bertrand Boyer; Philippe Adam; Frederic Farizon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Diagnostics and therapy of luxation after total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  B Preininger; F Haschke; C Perka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Short-term wear evaluation of thin acetabular liners on 36-mm femoral heads.

Authors:  Aaron J Johnson; LaQuawn Loving; Lizeth Herrera; Ronald E Delanois; Aiguo Wang; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Ideal femoral head size in total hip arthroplasty balances stability and volumetric wear.

Authors:  Michael B Cross; Denis Nam; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-13

8.  Wear and Osteolysis of Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene at 10 to 14 Years: The Effect of Femoral Head Size.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau; John M Martell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Do large femoral heads reduce the risks of impingement in total hip arthroplasty with optimal and non-optimal cup positioning?

Authors:  Gianluca Cinotti; Niccolò Lucioli; Andrea Malagoli; Carlo Calderoli; Ferdinando Cassese
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  The unstable total hip replacement.

Authors:  F D'Angelo; L Murena; G Zatti; P Cherubino
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.