Literature DB >> 25086820

Low femoral antetorsion and total hip arthroplasty: a risk factor.

Takeshi Shoji1, Yuji Yasunaga, Takuma Yamasaki, Soutarou Izumi, Susumu Hachisuka, Mitsuo Ochi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether femoral antetorsion affects the range of motion (ROM) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) using 3D dynamic analysis.
METHODS: Using 3D computed tomography (CT) data of 71 patients (71 hips) who underwent THA, we calculated antetorsion of the femoral neck, flexion range of motion (Flex ROM), internal rotation (Int-R) and external rotation (Ext-R). Evaluation of the relationship between antetorsion, ROM and the impingement site was performed. As for implant position, anteversion of the femoral implant was set to be the same as natural antetorsion of the femoral neck, and the acetabular component was set 45° of total anteversion in all cases.
RESULTS: We found a significant decrease in Flex ROM and Int-R inversely proportional to femoral antetorsion. In patients with lower antetorsion, Flex ROM and Int-R decreased due to bony impingement (the anterior great trochanteric region of the femur impinges on the anteroinferior edge of the anteroinferior iliac spine). However, in Ext-R, there was no relationship between ROM and femoral antetorsion.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that lower femoral antetorsion substantially affects Flex ROM and Int-R due to bony impingement. For these patients, consideration must be given to retaining femoral anterior offset in THA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086820     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2452-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial?

Authors:  Donald S Garbuz; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Nelson V Greidanus; Eric R Bohm; Martin J Petrak; Craig J Della Valle; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Which procedure better restores intact hip range of motion: total hip arthroplasty or resurfacing? A combined cadaveric and computer simulation study.

Authors:  Stephen J Incavo; Matthew T Thompson; Jonathan E Gold; Rikin V Patel; Kurt D Icenogle; Philip C Noble
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro.

Authors:  Enrico Schileo; Fulvia Taddei; Luca Cristofolini; Marco Viceconti
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  What factors affect posterior dislocation distance in THA?

Authors:  Jim Nevelos; Aaron Johnson; Christopher Heffernan; James Macintyre; David C Markel; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Comparative effectiveness of metal-on-metal and metal-on-polyethylene bearings in Medicare total hip arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Edmund C Lau; Kevin L Ong; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  B M Jolles; P Zangger; P-F Leyvraz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  A comparison of surgeon estimation and computed tomographic measurement of femoral component anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Zhinian Wan; Aamer Malik; Jinjun Zhu; Manish Dastane; Prashant Deshmane
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess whether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk.

Authors:  Jacques H Caton; Jean Louis Prudhon; André Ferreira; Thierry Aslanian; Régis Verdier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  Over 25 years survival after Charnley's total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jacques Caton; Jean Louis Prudhon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  6 in total

1.  Accuracy of combined anteversion in image-free navigated total hip arthroplasty: stem-first or cup-first technique?

Authors:  Shigeo Fukunishi; Shoji Nishio; Yuki Fujihara; Shohei Okahisa; Yu Takeda; Tomokazu Fukui; Shinichi Yoshiya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The influence of stem offset and neck shaft angles on the range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takeshi Shoji; Takuma Yamasaki; Soutarou Izumi; Susumu Hachisuka; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The accuracy of restoration of femoral head centre of rotation in the anteroposterior plane after uncemented total hip arthroplasty : a CT-based study.

Authors:  Asim Rajpura; Soheil Ghane Asle; Tarik Ait Si Selmi; Tim Board
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 5.853

4.  How frequent is absolute femoral retroversion in symptomatic patients with cam- and pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement?

Authors:  Malin K Meier; Jelena Reche; Florian Schmaranzer; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Simon D Steppacher; Moritz Tannast; Eduardo N Novais; Till D Lerch
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-07

5.  Combined abnormalities of femoral version and acetabular version and McKibbin Index in FAI patients evaluated for hip preservation surgery.

Authors:  Till D Lerch; Tiziano Antioco; Malin K Meier; Adam Boschung; Markus S Hanke; Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock; Florian Schmaranzer; Simon D Steppacher
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2022-04-21

6.  Determination of Femoral Neck Angle and Torsion Angle Utilizing a Novel Three-Dimensional Modeling and Analytical Technology Based on CT Datasets.

Authors:  Maximilian J Hartel; Andreas Petersik; Anne Schmidt; Daniel Kendoff; Jakob Nüchtern; Johannes M Rueger; Wolfgang Lehmann; Lars G Grossterlinden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.