Literature DB >> 15577473

Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do.

Roy D Crowninshield1, William J Maloney, Douglas H Wentz, Steve M Humphrey, Cheryl R Blanchard.   

Abstract

The stability and durability of total hip reconstruction is dependent on many factors that include the design and anatomic orientation of prosthetic components. An analysis of femoral component head size and acetabular component orientation shows an interdependency of these variables and joint stability. Increased femoral component head size can increase hip stability by increasing the prosthetic impingement-free range of hip motion and by increasing the inferior head displacement required before hip dislocation. Increasing the femoral head size from 22 mm to 40 mm increases the required displacement for dislocation by about 5 mm with the acetabular component at 45 degrees of abduction; however, increasing acetabular component abduction greatly diminishes this stability advantage of larger femoral heads. Vertical acetabular component orientation and femoral component head subluxation are each predicted to more than double the tensile stress with acetabular component polyethylene compared with components at 45 degrees of abduction. With a desirable acetabular component orientation, the use of larger femoral heads may result in improved joint stability and durable use of polyethylene. With high abduction acetabular component orientation, the use of larger femoral heads contributes little to joint stability and contributes to elevated stress within the polyethylene that may result in implant failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15577473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  56 in total

1.  The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial?

Authors:  Donald S Garbuz; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Nelson V Greidanus; Eric R Bohm; Martin J Petrak; Craig J Della Valle; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Do large heads enhance stability and restore native anatomy in primary total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Michael D Skeels; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Orlando J Franchi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Deformation of metal-backed acetabular components and the impact of liner thickness in a cadaveric model.

Authors:  David Markel; Judd Day; Ryan Siskey; Imants Liepins; Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Intraoperative radiographs for placing acetabular components in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Gross; Fei Liu; Lee Webb
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Stability and trunnion wear potential in large-diameter metal-on-metal total hips: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jacob M Elkins; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Risk factors for poor hip flexion after total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Liang Zhang; Dejin Yang; Xinghua Yin; Yixin Zhou
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  High stress conditions do not increase wear of thin highly crosslinked UHMWPE.

Authors:  Natalie H Kelly; Amar D Rajadhyaksha; Timothy M Wright; Suzanne A Maher; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Do large femoral heads reduce the risks of impingement in total hip arthroplasty with optimal and non-optimal cup positioning?

Authors:  Gianluca Cinotti; Niccolò Lucioli; Andrea Malagoli; Carlo Calderoli; Ferdinando Cassese
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  A cadaveric study of posterior dislocation after total hip replacement-effects of head diameter and acetabular anteversion.

Authors:  Fu Yuen Ng; Jiang Tao Zhang; Kwong Yuen Chiu; Chun Hoi Yan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Bony impingement limits design-related increases in hip range of motion.

Authors:  Adam Bunn; Clifford W Colwell; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.