Literature DB >> 18580388

Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40-64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005.

Susan A Sabatino1, Ralph J Coates, Robert J Uhler, Nancy Breen, Florence Tangka, Kate M Shaw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine current disparities in mammography use, and changes in disparities over time by race, ethnicity, income, insurance, and combinations of these characteristics. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Comparison of cross-sectional surveys of mammography use using the 1993 and 2005 National Health Interview Survey.
SUBJECTS: Women aged 40-64 (1993, n = 4167; 2005, n = 7434). MEASURES: Mammogram within prior 2 years.
RESULTS: In 2005, uninsured women reported the lowest mammography use (38.3%). Though screening increased 6.9 percentage points among low-income, uninsured women, the overall disparity between insured and uninsured women did not change significantly between 1993 and 2005. Screening seems to have declined among middle-income, uninsured women, increasing the gap compared with middle-income, insured women. The lower mammography use in 1993 among American Indian/Alaska Native compared with white women was not present in 2005; however, lower use among Asian compared with white women emerged in 2005. We found no differences between African American and white women. Hispanic women were less likely than non-Hispanic women to report screening in 2005 (58.1% vs. 69.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Although mammography use increased for some groups between 1993 and 2005, low-income, uninsured women continued to have the lowest screening rates in 2005 and the disparity for this group was not reduced. The gap in screening use for middle-income, uninsured women increased, resulting from possible declines in mammography even for uninsured women not in poverty. Asian women became less likely to receive screening in 2005. Continuing efforts are needed to eliminate disparities. Increased efforts are especially needed to address the large persistent disparity for uninsured women, including middle-income uninsured women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18580388     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817893b1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  65 in total

1.  Concern as motivation for protection: an investigation of mothers' concern about daughters' breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Lindsay Neuberger; Kami J Silk; Doshik Yun; Nicholas David Bowman; Jennifer Anderson
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-06-22

2.  Characteristics of US counties with no mammography capacity.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Jacqueline Miller; Thomas B Richards; Janet Kay Bobo; Ta Liu; Mary C White; Djenaba Joseph; Florence Tangka; Donatus U Ekwueme
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-12

3.  Breast cancer surveillance practices among women previously treated with chest radiation for a childhood cancer.

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Jennifer S Ford; Chaya S Moskowitz; Lisa R Diller; Melissa M Hudson; Joanne F Chou; Stephanie M Smith; Ann C Mertens; Tara O Henderson; Debra L Friedman; Wendy M Leisenring; Leslie L Robison
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Public education and targeted outreach to underserved women through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Whitney Levano; Jacqueline W Miller; Banning Leonard; Linda Bellick; Barbara E Crane; Stephenie K Kennedy; Natalie M Haslage; Whitney Hammond; Felicia S Tharpe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Beneficiaries: The Role of Physician Payment and Managed Care.

Authors:  Lindsay M Sabik; Bassam Dahman; Anushree Vichare; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.929

6.  Diagnostic resolution of cancer screening abnormalities at community health centers.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Ji-Hyun Lee; Ercilia R Calcano; Cathy D Meade; William J Fulp; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-08

7.  Racial differences in vasectomy utilization in the United States: data from the national survey of family growth.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Jillian T Henderson; John K Amory; James F Smith; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines for U.S. women aged 25-64: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).

Authors:  Wendy Nelson; Richard P Moser; Allison Gaffey; William Waldron
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Temporal trends in area socioeconomic disparities in breast-cancer incidence and mortality, 1988-2005.

Authors:  Mario Schootman; Min Lian; Anjali D Deshpande; Elizabeth A Baker; Sandi L Pruitt; Rebecca Aft; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Cost of services provided by the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Donatus U Ekwueme; Sujha Subramanian; Justin G Trogdon; Jacqueline W Miller; Janet E Royalty; Chunyu Li; Gery P Guy; Wesley Crouse; Hope Thompson; James G Gardner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.