Literature DB >> 23504266

Do Appalachian women attending a mobile mammography program differ from those visiting a stationary mammography facility?

Ami Vyas1, Suresh Madhavan, Kimberly Kelly, Aaron Metzger, Judith Schreiman, Scot Remick.   

Abstract

To compare the characteristics (demographic, access to care, health-related behavioral, self and family medical history, psychosocial) of women aged 40 years and above who utilize a mobile mammography unit with those women aged 40 years and above who obtain mammography screening at a stationary facility. A cross-sectional study design was used with participant cohorts comprised of women age 40 years and above throughout West Virginia (WV) who utilized mobile mammography unit to get mammogram and those who had mammography screening at the stationary facility and completed the Mammography Screening and Preventive Care Survey. A total of 1,161 women who utilized the mobile mammography unit and 1,104 women who utilized stationary facility were included in the analysis. In logistic regression after adjusting for all the variables, women who utilized mobile mammography unit were more likely to be in age group 40-49, with lower income, with no health insurance coverage, not visit doctor or obstetrician/gynecologist (OB/GYN) in the past year, not adherent to clinical breast exam and mammography screening guidelines, with lower perceived five-year risk of developing breast cancer and with high knowledge about mammography screening. Women who utilize mobile unit are not adherent to mammography screening guidelines thereby suggesting that the mobile mammography unit is indeed reaching a rural vulnerable population who may not routinely access preventive health services. Financial and insurance constraints, as well as access to medical care, restricted WV women from receiving mammography screening from the stationary screening facilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23504266      PMCID: PMC4893946          DOI: 10.1007/s10900-013-9667-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  18 in total

1.  Is screening mammography effective in elderly women?

Authors:  R Smith-Bindman; K Kerlikowske; T Gebretsadik; J Newman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne W Fletcher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Mammography and breast cancer: the new era.

Authors:  L Tabár; P B Dean
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  Declining mammography screening in a state Medicaid Fee-for-Service program: 1999-2008.

Authors:  Abhijeet Bhanegaonkar; S Suresh Madhavan; Rahul Khanna; Scot C Remick
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Mobile mammography: results of a national survey.

Authors:  N D DeBruhl; L W Bassett; N W Jessop; A M Mason
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Cancer incidence in Kentucky, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia: disparities in Appalachia.

Authors:  Eugene J Lengerich; Thomas C Tucker; Raymond K Powell; Pat Colsher; Erik Lehman; Ann J Ward; Jennifer C Siedlecki; Stephen W Wyatt
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years: evaluation of the Swedish Mammography Screening in Young Women (SCRY) cohort.

Authors:  Barbro Numan Hellquist; Stephen W Duffy; Shahin Abdsaleh; Lena Björneld; Pál Bordás; László Tabár; Bedrich Viták; Sophia Zackrisson; Lennarth Nyström; Håkan Jonsson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Women's receptivity to church-based mobile mammography.

Authors:  Kathryn Pitkin Derose; Naihua Duan; Sarah A Fox
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2002-05

Review 9.  Breast cancer screening with mammography.

Authors:  Bradford R Hirsch; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 10.  Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Kari Tyne; Arpana Naik; Christina Bougatsos; Benjamin K Chan; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  4 in total

1.  Predictors of self-reported adherence to mammography screening guidelines in West Virginia women visiting a stationary facility.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Kimberly Kelly; Aaron Metzger; Judith Schreiman; Scott Remick
Journal:  W V Med J       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

2.  Delays in Follow-up Care for Abnormal Mammograms in Mobile Mammography Versus Fixed-Clinic Patients.

Authors:  Suzanne S Vang; Alexandra Dunn; Laurie R Margolies; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.473

Review 3.  Mobile Mammography Services and Underserved Women.

Authors:  Usha Trivedi; Toma S Omofoye; Cindy Marquez; Callie R Sullivan; Diane M Benson; Gary J Whitman
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-05

4.  Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Suzanne Vang; Laurie R Margolies; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.830

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.