Literature DB >> 11717331

Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys.

N Breen1, D K Wagener, M L Brown, W W Davis, R Ballard-Barbash.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening to detect cancer early, an increasingly important cancer control activity, cannot be effective unless it is widely used.
METHODS: Use of Pap smears, mammography, fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs), sigmoidoscopy, and digital rectal examination (DRE) was evaluated in the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. Levels and trends in screening use were examined by sex, age, and racial/ethnic group. The effects of income, educational level, and health care coverage were examined within age groups. Logistic regression analyses of 1998 data were used to develop a parsimonious, policy-relevant model.
RESULTS: Use of all screening modalities increased over the period examined; for mammography and DRE, the increase was more rapid in the first half of the decade; for the Pap test and sigmoidoscopy, the increase was more rapid in the second half of the decade. Levels of colorectal cancer screening (both sigmoidoscopy and FOBTs) in 1998 were less than the level that prevailed a decade earlier for mammography. Patterns of change for all screening modalities differed between age, sex, and racial/ethnic groups, but prevalence of use during the study, within recommended time intervals, was consistently lower among groups with lower income and less education. Logistic regression analyses indicated that insurance coverage and, to a greater extent, usual source of care had strong independent associations with screening usage when age, sex, racial/ethnic group, and educational level were taken into account.
CONCLUSIONS: While cancer screening is generally increasing in the United States, usage is relatively low for colorectal cancer screening and among groups that lack health insurance or a usual source of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11717331     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/93.22.1704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  135 in total

1.  Psychosocial risk profiles among black male Veterans Administration patients non-adherent with colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Rhonda BeLue; Usha Menon; Anita Y Kinney; Laura A Szalacha
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Sociocultural correlates of breast cancer knowledge and screening in urban African American women.

Authors:  Susan N Lukwago; Matthew W Kreuter; Cheryl L Holt; Karen Steger-May; Dawn C Bucholtz; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Use of preventive services by men enrolled in Medicare+Choice plans.

Authors:  Leo S Morales; Jeannette Rogowski; Vicki A Freedman; Steven L Wickstrom; John L Adams; José J Escarce
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The effect of access and satisfaction on regular mammogram and Papanicolaou test screening in a multiethnic population.

Authors:  Carol P Somkin; Stephen J McPhee; Tung Nguyen; Susan Stewart; Sarah J Shema; Bang Nguyen; Rena Pasick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Colonoscopist and primary care physician supply and disparities in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jaime Benarroch-Gampel; Kristin M Sheffield; Yu-Li Lin; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Significance of increasing poverty levels for determining late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in 1990 and 2000.

Authors:  Janis Barry; Nancy Breen; Michael Barrett
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.671

7.  A qualitative analysis of couples' communication regarding colorectal cancer screening using the Interdependence Model.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Rebecca S Etz; Shawna V Hudson; Amanda Medina-Forrester; Joseph A Boscarino; Deborah J Bowen; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-08-10

Review 8.  Screening for cancer: valuable or not?

Authors:  Frank L Meyskens
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Differences in endoscopic classification of early colorectal carcinoma between China and Japan: a comparative study.

Authors:  Ren-Min Zhu; Fang-Yu Wang; Ichiro Hirata; Ken-Ichi Katsu; Shu-Dong Xiao; Zhong-Lin Yu; Zhi-Hong Zhang; Zhao-Min Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Developing and testing a decision aid for use by providers in making recommendations: about mammography screening in older women.

Authors:  Diana M Tisnado; Alison A Moore; Jennifer R Levin; Sonja Rosen
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2012-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.