Literature DB >> 18954237

Factors associated with mammography utilization: a systematic quantitative review of the literature.

Kristin M Schueler1, Philip W Chu, Rebecca Smith-Bindman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A significant segment of women remains underscreened with mammography. We sought to summarize literature related to factors associated with receipt of mammography. For data sources, we used English language papers published between 1988 and 2007, including 221 studies describing 4,957,347 women.
METHODS: We calculated odds ratios (ORs) associated with receipt of mammography. Random effects modeling was used to assess trends in mammography utilization and to calculate summary multivariate point estimates. Results were stratified by age, race/ethnicity, and study year. We summarized results between 1988 and 2004 and compared recent years with these results.
RESULTS: Physician access barriers, such as not having a physician-recommend mammography (adjusted OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08-0.33) and having no primary care provider (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.32-0.53), were highly predictive of not obtaining mammography. Past screening behavior correlated strongly with receipt of mammography (clinical breast examination, adjusted OR 9.15, 95% CI 3.49-23.98) and Pap test (adjusted OR 3.45, 95% CI 2.12-5.62). With the exception of having no insurance (adjusted OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.39-0.57), several potential socioeconomic barriers did not appear to have an important impact on screening. Racial and ethnic differences were seen. Concerns about cost, mammography safety, and pain were more important to African American and Latina women, and having no insurance was more important to white and Chinese women. Cost concerns and the presence of a family history of breast cancer were less important to older women, whereas screening knowledge had a stronger impact on mammography use in women aged > or =65 years. When we compared study results before 2004 with those later, we found very little difference in the multivariate, adjusted ORs over time.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with poor access to physicians are much less likely to undergo mammography. Improving the frequency and scope of mammography recommendation by primary care providers is the single most important direct contribution the medical community can make toward increasing mammography use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18954237     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  144 in total

1.  Patient Barriers to Mammography Identified During a Reminder Program.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; Jennifer Schneider; Mary M Rix; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Results of a community-based randomized trial to increase colorectal cancer screening among Filipino Americans.

Authors:  Annette E Maxwell; Roshan Bastani; Leda L Danao; Cynthia Antonio; Gabriel M Garcia; Catherine M Crespi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Pilot test of a peer-led small-group video intervention to promote mammography screening among Chinese American immigrants.

Authors:  Annette E Maxwell; Judy H Wang; Lucy Young; Catherine M Crespi; Ritesh Mistry; Madhuri Sudan; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2010-08-18

4.  Association Between Recency of Immigration and Mammography Uptake: Results from a Canadian National Survey.

Authors:  Prince A Adu; U Vivian Ukah; Sheena D Palmer
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-02

5.  Declining mammography screening in a state Medicaid Fee-for-Service program: 1999-2008.

Authors:  Abhijeet Bhanegaonkar; S Suresh Madhavan; Rahul Khanna; Scot C Remick
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  The Effect of Educational Intervention Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior on Mammography Screening in Iranian Women.

Authors:  Ali Khani Jeihooni; Niloofar Darvishi; Pooyan Afzali Harsini
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Breast Cancer Screening for Patients of Rural Accountable Care Organization Clinics: A Multi-Level Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators.

Authors:  Hongmei Wang; Abbey Gregg; Fang Qiu; Jungyoon Kim; Baojiang Chen; Neng Wan; Dejun Su; Tzeyu Michaud; Li-Wu Chen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-04

8.  Individual, provider, and system risk factors for breast and cervical cancer screening among underserved Black, Latina, and Arab women.

Authors:  Leeanne Roman; Cristian Meghea; Sabrina Ford; Louis Penner; Hiam Hamade; Tamika Estes; Karen Patricia Williams
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Breast cancer screening initiation after turning 40 years of age within the PROSPR consortium.

Authors:  Elisabeth F Beaber; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Tracy Onega; Brian L Sprague; Donald L Weaver; Anne Marie McCarthy; Chyke A Doubeni; Virginia P Quinn; Celette Sugg Skinner; Ann G Zauber; William E Barlow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Multilevel Predictors of Continued Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening Among Women Ages 50-74 Years in a Screening Population.

Authors:  Elisabeth F Beaber; Brian L Sprague; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Tracy Onega; Marilyn M Schapira; Anne Marie McCarthy; Christopher I Li; Sally D Herschorn; Constance D Lehman; Karen J Wernli; William E Barlow
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.