Literature DB >> 27287274

Breast Cancer Screening Among Women with Medicaid, 2006-2008: a Multilevel Analysis.

Lee Rivers Mobley1, Sujha Subramanian2, Florence K Tangka3, Sonja Hoover2, Jiantong Wang2, Ingrid J Hall3, Simple D Singh3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Nationally, about one third of women with breast cancer (BC) are diagnosed at late stage, which might be reduced with greater utilization of BC screening. The purpose of this paper is to examine the predictors of BC mammography use among women with Medicaid, and differences among Medicaid beneficiaries in their propensity to use mammography.
METHODS: The sample included 2,450,527 women drawn from both fee-for-service and managed care Medicaid claims from 25 states, during 2006-2008. The authors used multilevel modeling of predictors at person, county, and state levels of influence and examined traditional factors affecting access and the expanded scope of practice allowed for the nurse practitioner (NP) in some states to provide primary care independent of physician oversight.
RESULTS: Black [OR = 0.87; 95 % CI (0.87-0.88)] and American Indian women [OR = 0.74; 95 % CI (0.71-0.76)] had lower odds ratio of mammography use than white women, while Hispanic [OR = 1.06; 95 % CI (1.05-1.07)] had higher odds ratio of mammography use than white women. Living in counties with higher Hispanic residential segregation [OR = 1.16; 95 % CI (1.10-1.23)] was associated with a higher odds ratio of mammography use compared to areas with low Hispanic residential segregation, whereas living among more segregated black [OR = 0.78; 95 % CI (0.75-0.81)] or Asian [OR = 0.19; 95 % CI (0.17-0.21)] communities had lower odds ratio compared to areas with low segregation. Holding constant statistically the perceived shortage of MDs, which was associated with significantly lower mammography use, the NP regulatory variable [OR = 1.03; 95 % CI (1.01-1.07)] enhanced the odds ratio of mammography use among women in the six states with expanded scope of practice, compared with women residing in 19 more restrictive states.
CONCLUSIONS: Racial and ethnic disparities exist in the use of mammography among Medicaid-insured women. More expansive NP practice privileges in states are associated with higher utilization, and may help reduce rural disparities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer screening; Medicaid; Multilevel analysis; Nurse practitioner regulation; Racial or ethnic disparities; Racial or ethnic residential segregation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27287274      PMCID: PMC5863532          DOI: 10.1007/s40615-016-0245-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities        ISSN: 2196-8837


  26 in total

1.  Geographic variation in access to care--the relationship with quality.

Authors:  David C Radley; Cathy Schoen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Declining mammography screening in a state Medicaid Fee-for-Service program: 1999-2008.

Authors:  Abhijeet Bhanegaonkar; S Suresh Madhavan; Rahul Khanna; Scot C Remick
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Geographic disparities in late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in California.

Authors:  Tzy-Mey Kuo; Lee R Mobley; Luc Anselin
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 4.078

4.  Contextual Analysis of Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis Among Women in the United States, 2004.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Lisa C Richardson; Jean Orelien; Trevor Thompson; Thomas B Richards; Susan A Sabatino; Wei Wu; Darryl Cooney
Journal:  Open Health Serv Policy J       Date:  2009-01-01

Review 5.  Determinants of cancer disparities: barriers to cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Harold P Freeman; Kenneth C Chu
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.495

6.  Black residential segregation, disparities in spatial access to health care facilities, and late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in metropolitan Detroit.

Authors:  Dajun Dai
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.078

7.  Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40-64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Ralph J Coates; Robert J Uhler; Nancy Breen; Florence Tangka; Kate M Shaw
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 8.  Is segregation bad for your health?

Authors:  Michael R Kramer; Carol R Hogue
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 6.222

9.  United States Health Policies and Late-stage Breast and colorectal cancer diagnosis: Why such disparities by age?

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Tzy-Mey Kuo
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2015-07-15

10.  Heterogeneity in mammography use across the nation: separating evidence of disparities from the disproportionate effects of geography.

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Tzy-Mey May Kuo; David Driscoll; Laurel Clayton; Luc Anselin
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 3.918

View more
  13 in total

1.  Medical costs of treating breast cancer among younger Medicaid beneficiaries by stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Justin G Trogdon; Donatus U Ekwueme; Diana Poehler; Cheryll C Thomas; Katherine Reeder-Hayes; Benjamin T Allaire
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Screening mammography among nursing home residents in the United States: Current guidelines and practice.

Authors:  Deborah S Mack; Mara M Epstein; Catherine Dubé; Robin E Clark; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  Measures Matter: The Local Exposure/Isolation (LEx/Is) Metrics and Relationships between Local-Level Segregation and Breast Cancer Survival.

Authors:  Amin Bemanian; Kirsten M M Beyer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Disparities in abnormal mammogram follow-up time for Asian women compared with non-Hispanic white women and between Asian ethnic groups.

Authors:  Kim H Nguyen; Rena J Pasick; Susan L Stewart; Karla Kerlikowske; Leah S Karliner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Racial and ethnic disparities among state Medicaid programs for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Florence K Tangka; Sujha Subramanian; Lee Rivers Mobley; Sonja Hoover; Jiantong Wang; Ingrid J Hall; Simple D Singh
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Associations between perceived racial discrimination, racial residential segregation, and cancer screening adherence among low-income African Americans: a multilevel, cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Lynn N Ibekwe; Maria Eugenia Fernández-Esquer; Sandi L Pruitt; Nalini Ranjit; Maria E Fernández
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.732

7.  Racial/ethnic segregation and health disparities: Future directions and opportunities.

Authors:  Tse-Chuan Yang; Kiwoong Park; Stephen A Matthews
Journal:  Sociol Compass       Date:  2020-04-05

8.  Prevalence of and factors associated with mammography and prostate-specific antigen screening among World Trade Center Health Registry enrollees, 2015-2016.

Authors:  Janette Yung; Jiehui Li; Hannah T Jordan; James E Cone
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-05-10

9.  The Challenges of Screening Mammography in Racial/Ethnic Minority Populations in the United States: A mini-review and observations from a predominantly Hispanic community.

Authors:  Julia E McGuinness; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  J Cancer Treatment Diagn       Date:  2018-04-05

10.  Cancer Incidence and Multilevel Measures of Residential Economic and Racial Segregation for Cancer Registries.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Justin M Feldman; Rockli Kim; Pamela D Waterman
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2018-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.