Literature DB >> 22562589

Fore-aft translation aftereffects.

Benjamin T Crane1.   

Abstract

A general theme in sensory perception is that exposure to a stimulus makes it seem more neutral such that perception of subsequent stimuli is shifted in the opposite direction. The visual motion aftereffect (MAE) is an extensively studied example of this. Although similar effects have been described in other sensory systems, it has not previously been described in the vestibular system. Velocity storage has been extensively studied in the vestibular system and suggests a persistence of perception in the direction of the initial movement. The current study sought to determine how motion perception is influenced by prior movement in darkness. Thirteen human subjects (mean age 41, range 21-68) underwent whole-body fore-aft translation. The threshold of vestibular motion discrimination perception was measured using a single interval (1I) of motion lasting 0.5 s in which subjects identified their direction of motion as forward or backward using an adaptive staircase. The translation aftereffect (TAE) was measured in 2-interval (2I) experiments: The adapting stimulus moved 15 cm in 1.5 s (peak velocity 20 cm/s, peak acceleration 42 cm/s(2)). After a fixed inter-stimulus interval (ISI) of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, or 3 s, a second stimulus lasting 0.5 s was delivered and the subject identified the perceived direction of the second test stimulus. The test stimulus was determined using an adaptive staircase. The ISI was constant within the block, but adapting stimuli directions were randomly interleaved. During the 1I condition, the response bias was near zero in all subjects. With a 2I stimulus, 8 of 13 subjects demonstrated a significant bias. At an ISI of 0.5 s, a minority of subjects demonstrated a bias in the same direction as the adapter. When the ISI was 1, 1.5, or 3 s, all subjects who demonstrated a significant TAE had one in the opposite direction of the adapter, similar to that seen for MAE. When averaged across subjects, the TAE was significant with ISIs of 1.0 s and above. These findings demonstrate that perception of vestibular stimuli depends on prior motion. This has important implications for understanding and quantifying vestibular perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22562589      PMCID: PMC3463106          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3105-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  51 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal processing of linear acceleration: primary afferent and central vestibular neuron responses.

Authors:  D E Angelaki; J D Dickman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Role of the vestibular apparatus in the perception of motion on a parallel swing.

Authors:  E G WALSH
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1961-03       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Auditory adaptation in vocal affect perception.

Authors:  Patricia E G Bestelmeyer; Julien Rouger; Lisa M DeBruine; Pascal Belin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-11

4.  Velocity storage contribution to vestibular self-motion perception in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  G Bertolini; S Ramat; J Laurens; C J Bockisch; S Marti; D Straumann; A Palla
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Vestibular thresholds for yaw rotation about an earth-vertical axis as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Luzia Grabherr; Keyvan Nicoucar; Fred W Mast; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Probing visual motion signals with a priming paradigm.

Authors:  A Pinkus; A Pantle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Decoding of MSTd population activity accounts for variations in the precision of heading perception.

Authors:  Yong Gu; Christopher R Fetsch; Babatunde Adeyemo; Gregory C Deangelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Habituation and adaptation of the vestibuloocular reflex: a model of differential control by the vestibulocerebellum.

Authors:  H Cohen; B Cohen; T Raphan; W Waespe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Do humans show velocity-storage in the vertical rVOR?

Authors:  G Bertolini; C J Bockisch; D Straumann; D S Zee; S Ramat
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.453

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Dynamics of individual perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Daniel M Merfeld; Torin K Clark; Yue M Lu; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Whole body motion-detection tasks can yield much lower thresholds than direction-recognition tasks: implications for the role of vibration.

Authors:  Shomesh E Chaudhuri; Faisal Karmali; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Human yaw rotation aftereffects with brief duration rotations are inconsistent with velocity storage.

Authors:  Andrew J Coniglio; Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-10

4.  A quantitative confidence signal detection model: 1. Fitting psychometric functions.

Authors:  Yongwoo Yi; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Human sensitivity to vertical self-motion.

Authors:  Alessandro Nesti; Michael Barnett-Cowan; Paul R Macneilage; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The Impact of Oral Promethazine on Human Whole-Body Motion Perceptual Thresholds.

Authors:  Ana Diaz-Artiles; Adrian J Priesol; Torin K Clark; David P Sherwood; Charles M Oman; Laurence R Young; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-24

7.  Signal detection theory and vestibular perception: III. Estimating unbiased fit parameters for psychometric functions.

Authors:  Shomesh E Chaudhuri; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Perception of threshold-level whole-body motion during mechanical mastoid vibration.

Authors:  Rakshatha Kabbaligere; Charles S Layne; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Limited interaction between translation and visual motion aftereffects in humans.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The influence of head and body tilt on human fore-aft translation perception.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.