Literature DB >> 24158607

Human sensitivity to vertical self-motion.

Alessandro Nesti1, Michael Barnett-Cowan, Paul R Macneilage, Heinrich H Bülthoff.   

Abstract

Perceiving vertical self-motion is crucial for maintaining balance as well as for controlling an aircraft. Whereas heave absolute thresholds have been exhaustively studied, little work has been done in investigating how vertical sensitivity depends on motion intensity (i.e., differential thresholds). Here we measure human sensitivity for 1-Hz sinusoidal accelerations for 10 participants in darkness. Absolute and differential thresholds are measured for upward and downward translations independently at 5 different peak amplitudes ranging from 0 to 2 m/s(2). Overall vertical differential thresholds are higher than horizontal differential thresholds found in the literature. Psychometric functions are fit in linear and logarithmic space, with goodness of fit being similar in both cases. Differential thresholds are higher for upward as compared to downward motion and increase with stimulus intensity following a trend best described by two power laws. The power laws' exponents of 0.60 and 0.42 for upward and downward motion, respectively, deviate from Weber's Law in that thresholds increase less than expected at high stimulus intensity. We speculate that increased sensitivity at high accelerations and greater sensitivity to downward than upward self-motion may reflect adaptations to avoid falling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24158607      PMCID: PMC3898153          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3741-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  40 in total

1.  Physiological deficits occurring with lesions of labyrinth and fastigial nuclei.

Authors:  M B CARPENTER; H FABREGA; W GLINSMANN
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Role of the vestibular apparatus in the perception of motion on a parallel swing.

Authors:  E G WALSH
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1961-03       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Velocity storage contribution to vestibular self-motion perception in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  G Bertolini; S Ramat; J Laurens; C J Bockisch; S Marti; D Straumann; A Palla
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Response of vestibular nerve afferents innervating utricle and saccule during passive and active translations.

Authors:  Mohsen Jamali; Soroush G Sadeghi; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Thresholds for detection of motion direction during passive lateral whole-body acceleration in normal subjects and patients with bilateral loss of labyrinthine function.

Authors:  C Gianna; S Heimbrand; M Gresty
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Subjective detection of vertical acceleration: a velocity-dependent response?

Authors:  G M Jones; L R Young
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1978 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. II. Directional selectivity and force-response relations.

Authors:  C Fernández; J M Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Translational motion perception and vestiboocular responses in the absence of non-inertial cues.

Authors:  S H Seidman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Vestibular perceptual thresholds to angular rotation in acute unilateral vestibular paresis and with galvanic stimulation.

Authors:  Nicholas J Cutfield; Sian Cousins; Barry M Seemungal; Michael A Gresty; Adolfo M Bronstein
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  The importance of stimulus noise analysis for self-motion studies.

Authors:  Alessandro Nesti; Karl A Beykirch; Paul R MacNeilage; Michael Barnett-Cowan; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  16 in total

1.  Sound-evoked vestibular stimulation affects the anticipation of gravity effects during visual self-motion.

Authors:  Iole Indovina; Elisabetta Mazzarella; Vincenzo Maffei; Benedetta Cesqui; Luca Passamonti; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vestibular implantation and longitudinal electrical stimulation of the semicircular canal afferents in human subjects.

Authors:  James O Phillips; Leo Ling; Kaibao Nie; Elyse Jameyson; Christopher M Phillips; Amy L Nowack; Justin S Golub; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Exposure to multisensory and visual static or moving stimuli enhances processing of nonoptimal visual rhythms.

Authors:  Ourania Tachmatzidou; Nadia Paraskevoudi; Argiro Vatakis
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  Dissociating vestibular and somatosensory contributions to spatial orientation.

Authors:  Bart B G T Alberts; Luc P J Selen; Giovanni Bertolini; Dominik Straumann; W Pieter Medendorp; Alexander A Tarnutzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Order effects in two-alternative forced-choice tasks invalidate adaptive threshold estimates.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Rocío Alcalá-Quintana
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-10

6.  Impact of gravity on the perception of linear motion.

Authors:  Megan J Kobel; Andrew R Wagner; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.974

7.  The importance of stimulus noise analysis for self-motion studies.

Authors:  Alessandro Nesti; Karl A Beykirch; Paul R MacNeilage; Michael Barnett-Cowan; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Self-motion sensitivity to visual yaw rotations in humans.

Authors:  Alessandro Nesti; Karl A Beykirch; Paolo Pretto; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Human discrimination of head-centred visual-inertial yaw rotations.

Authors:  Alessandro Nesti; Karl A Beykirch; Paolo Pretto; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The importance of postural cues for determining eye height in immersive virtual reality.

Authors:  Markus Leyrer; Sally A Linkenauger; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Betty J Mohler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.