Literature DB >> 24408345

Human yaw rotation aftereffects with brief duration rotations are inconsistent with velocity storage.

Andrew J Coniglio1, Benjamin T Crane.   

Abstract

In many sensory systems, perception of stimuli is influenced by previous stimulus exposure such that subsequent stimuli may be perceived as more neutral. This phenomenon is known as an aftereffect and has been studied for vision, audition, and some vestibular stimuli including roll and translation. Previous data on yaw rotation perception has focused on low-frequency stimuli on the order of a minute which may not be directly applicable to frequencies during ambulation. The aim of the current study is to look at the influence of yaw rotation on subsequent perception near 1 Hz, the predominant frequency of yaw rotation during human ambulation. Humans were rotated with 12 ° whole body adapting stimulus over 1 or 1.5 s. After an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, or 3 s, a test stimulus the same duration as the adapting stimulus was presented, and subjects pushed a button to identify the direction of the test stimulus as right or left. The direction and magnitude of the test stimulus was adjusted based on prior responses to find the stimulus at which no rotation was perceived. Experiments were conducted both in darkness and with a visual fixation point. The presence of a fixation point did not influence the aftereffect which was largest at 0.5 s with an average size of 0.78 ± 0.18°/s (mean ± SE). The aftereffect diminished with a time constant of ~1 s. Thresholds were elevated after the adapting stimulus and also decreased with a time constant of ~1 s. These findings demonstrate that short adapting stimuli can induce significant aftereffects in yaw rotation perception and that these aftereffects are independent from the previously described velocity storage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24408345      PMCID: PMC3946141          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0438-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  56 in total

1.  The temporal growth and decay of the auditory motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Michael F Neelon; Rick L Jenison
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The time course of adaptation to spatial contrast.

Authors:  M W Greenlee; M A Georgeson; S Magnussen; J P Harris
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Velocity storage contribution to vestibular self-motion perception in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  G Bertolini; S Ramat; J Laurens; C J Bockisch; S Marti; D Straumann; A Palla
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes; Kai-Markus Müller; Linda Jeffery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Vestibular thresholds for yaw rotation about an earth-vertical axis as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Luzia Grabherr; Keyvan Nicoucar; Fred W Mast; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Perception of self motion during and after passive rotation of the body around an earth-vertical axis.

Authors:  N Sinha; N Zaher; A G Shaikh; A G Lasker; D S Zee; A A Tarnutzer
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 7.  Computational approaches to spatial orientation: from transfer functions to dynamic Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Narayan Ganesan; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Performance of the human vestibuloocular reflex during locomotion.

Authors:  G E Grossman; R J Leigh; E N Bruce; W P Huebner; D J Lanska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Self-motion sensation influenced by visual fixation.

Authors:  G Keller; V Henn
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-03

10.  Suppression of the human vestibulo-ocular reflex by visual fixation or forced convergence in the dark, with a model interpretation.

Authors:  Martin S Gizzi; Harry Wms Harper
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.424

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Dynamics of individual perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Daniel M Merfeld; Torin K Clark; Yue M Lu; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A quantitative confidence signal detection model: 1. Fitting psychometric functions.

Authors:  Yongwoo Yi; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Perceptual precision of passive body tilt is consistent with statistically optimal cue integration.

Authors:  Koeun Lim; Faisal Karmali; Keyvan Nicoucar; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The influence of head and body tilt on human fore-aft translation perception.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Vestibular Precision at the Level of Perception, Eye Movements, Posture, and Neurons.

Authors:  Ana Diaz-Artiles; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Accumulation of Inertial Sensory Information in the Perception of Whole Body Yaw Rotation.

Authors:  Alessandro Nesti; Ksander de Winkel; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Perceptual Biases as the Side Effect of a Multisensory Adaptive System: Insights from Verticality and Self-Motion Perception.

Authors:  Luigi F Cuturi
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-26

8.  Influence of Visual Motion, Suggestion, and Illusory Motion on Self-Motion Perception in the Horizontal Plane.

Authors:  Steven David Rosenblatt; Benjamin Thomas Crane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.