Literature DB >> 25160866

The influence of head and body tilt on human fore-aft translation perception.

Benjamin T Crane1.   

Abstract

The tilt-translation ambiguity occurs because acceleration due to translation cannot be differentiated from gravitational acceleration. Head tilt can occur independent of body tilt which further complicates the problem. The tilt-translation ambiguity is examined for fore-aft (surge) translation with head and/or body orientations that are tilted in pitch 10° forward or backward. Eleven human subjects (six female), mean age 40 years participated. Conditions included no tilt (NT), head and body tilt (HBT), head only tilt (HOT), and body only tilt (BOT). The fore-aft stimulus consisted of a 2 s (0.5 Hz) sine wave in acceleration which a maximum peak velocity of 10 cm/s. After each stimulus, the subject reported the direction of motion as forward or backward. Subsequent stimuli were adjusted to determine the point at which subjects were equally likely to report motion in either direction. During the HBT, responses were biased such that upward pitch caused a neutral stimulus to be more likely to be perceived as forward and downward pitch caused the stimulus to be more likely to be perceived as backward. The difference in the point of subjective equality based on the direction of tilt was 3.3 cm/s. During the BOT condition, the bias with respect to the direction of body tilt was in a similar direction with a difference in PSE 1.6 cm/s. During HOT and NT, there was no significant bias on fore-aft perception. These findings demonstrate that body tilt shifts the PSE of fore-aft direction discrimination while head tilt has no influence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25160866      PMCID: PMC5091300          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4060-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  54 in total

1.  Neurons compute internal models of the physical laws of motion.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Aasef G Shaikh; Andrea M Green; J David Dickman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Response of vestibular neurons to head rotations in vertical planes. III. Response of vestibulocollic neurons to vestibular and neck stimulation.

Authors:  V J Wilson; Y Yamagata; B J Yates; R H Schor; S Nonaka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Multiple sensory cues underlying the perception of translation and path.

Authors:  N Au Yong; G D Paige; S H Seidman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The nervous system uses internal models to achieve sensory integration.

Authors:  Lionel H Zupan; Sukyung Park; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

5.  Vestibular thresholds for yaw rotation about an earth-vertical axis as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Luzia Grabherr; Keyvan Nicoucar; Fred W Mast; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration.

Authors:  S H Seidman; L Telford; G D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Dynamic transformation of vestibular signals for orientation.

Authors:  Callum J Osler; Raymond F Reynolds
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The neurophysiological substrate for the cervico-ocular reflex in the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  G T Gdowski; T Belton; R A McCrea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; L H Zupan; C A Gifford
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Roll aftereffects: influence of tilt and inter-stimulus interval.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Does Inferior-Olive Hypersynchrony Affect Vestibular Heading Perception?

Authors:  Sinem Balta Beylergil; Palak Gupta; Aasef G Shaikh
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  When gravity is not where it should be: How perceived orientation affects visual self-motion processing.

Authors:  Meaghan McManus; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Body Orientation Affects the Perceived Size of Objects.

Authors:  John J-J Kim; Meaghan E McManus; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Coordinates of Human Visual and Inertial Heading Perception.

Authors:  Benjamin Thomas Crane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Influence of Visual Motion, Suggestion, and Illusory Motion on Self-Motion Perception in the Horizontal Plane.

Authors:  Steven David Rosenblatt; Benjamin Thomas Crane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.