Literature DB >> 23250442

Signal detection theory and vestibular perception: III. Estimating unbiased fit parameters for psychometric functions.

Shomesh E Chaudhuri1, Daniel M Merfeld.   

Abstract

Psychophysics generally relies on estimating a subject's ability to perform a specific task as a function of an observed stimulus. For threshold studies, the fitted functions are called psychometric functions. While fitting psychometric functions to data acquired using adaptive sampling procedures (e.g., "staircase" procedures), investigators have encountered a bias in the spread ("slope" or "threshold") parameter that has been attributed to the serial dependency of the adaptive data. Using simulations, we confirm this bias for cumulative Gaussian parametric maximum likelihood fits on data collected via adaptive sampling procedures, and then present a bias-reduced maximum likelihood fit that substantially reduces the bias without reducing the precision of the spread parameter estimate and without reducing the accuracy or precision of the other fit parameters. As a separate topic, we explain how to implement this bias reduction technique using generalized linear model fits as well as other numeric maximum likelihood techniques such as the Nelder-Mead simplex. We then provide a comparison of the iterative bootstrap and observed information matrix techniques for estimating parameter fit variance from adaptive sampling procedure data sets. The iterative bootstrap technique is shown to be slightly more accurate; however, the observed information technique executes in a small fraction (0.005 %) of the time required by the iterative bootstrap technique, which is an advantage when a real-time estimate of parameter fit variance is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23250442      PMCID: PMC3570703          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3354-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

1.  Fitting the psychometric function.

Authors:  B Treutwein; H Strasburger
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-01

2.  Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary.

Authors:  S A Klein
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

Review 3.  Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research.

Authors:  M R Leek
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

4.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

5.  Slope bias of psychometric functions derived from adaptive data.

Authors:  C Kaernbach
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

6.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

7.  Estimation of psychometric functions from adaptive tracking procedures.

Authors:  M R Leek; T E Hanna; L Marshall
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

8.  Modeling psychometric functions in R.

Authors:  Rosa Yssaad-Fesselier; Kenneth Knoblauch
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2006-02

9.  Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: implications of probit analysis.

Authors:  S P McKee; S A Klein; D Y Teller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-04

10.  Hybrid adaptive procedure for estimation of psychometric functions.

Authors:  J L Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  27 in total

1.  Temporal and spatial constraints of action effect on sensory binding.

Authors:  Xavier Corveleyn; Joan Lopez-Moliner; Yann Coello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Whole body motion-detection tasks can yield much lower thresholds than direction-recognition tasks: implications for the role of vibration.

Authors:  Shomesh E Chaudhuri; Faisal Karmali; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Human yaw rotation aftereffects with brief duration rotations are inconsistent with velocity storage.

Authors:  Andrew J Coniglio; Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-10

4.  A quantitative confidence signal detection model: 1. Fitting psychometric functions.

Authors:  Yongwoo Yi; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Frontal scalp potentials foretell perceptual choice confidence.

Authors:  Koeun Lim; Wei Wang; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  When uncertain, does human self-motion decision-making fully utilize complete information?

Authors:  Torin K Clark; Yongwoo Yi; Raquel C Galvan-Garza; María Carolina Bermúdez Rey; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Perceptual precision of passive body tilt is consistent with statistically optimal cue integration.

Authors:  Koeun Lim; Faisal Karmali; Keyvan Nicoucar; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Perception of threshold-level whole-body motion during mechanical mastoid vibration.

Authors:  Rakshatha Kabbaligere; Charles S Layne; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  The influence of head and body tilt on human fore-aft translation perception.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Determining thresholds using adaptive procedures and psychometric fits: evaluating efficiency using theory, simulations, and human experiments.

Authors:  Faisal Karmali; Shomesh E Chaudhuri; Yongwoo Yi; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.