Literature DB >> 7596265

Magnetostimulation in MRI.

W Irnich1, F Schmitt.   

Abstract

In national and international bodies, there is active discussion of appropriate safety regulations of levels of magnetic field strength in MRI. Present limits are usually expressed in terms of the switching rate dB/dt, but the validity of this is open to debate. Application of the fundamental law of electrostimulation is well-established, both on theoretical and experimental grounds. Application of this law, in combination with Maxwell's law, yields a very simple equation that we call the fundamental law of magnetostimulation. This law has the hyperbolic form of a strength-duration curve and allows an estimation of the lowest possible value of the magnetic flux density capable of stimulating nerves and muscles. Calculations prove that the threshold for heart excitation is much higher than those for nerve and muscle stimulations. Experimental results from us and other authors confirm the correctness of the derived laws for magnetostimulation. In light of these findings, proposed safety limits should be reconsidered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7596265     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910330506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  16 in total

Review 1.  The modular gradient coil: an holistic approach to power efficient and high performance whole-body MRI without peripheral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  P R Harvey; E Katznelson
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Occupational exposure in MRI.

Authors:  D W McRobbie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  A new method for spatially selective, non-invasive activation of neurons: concept and computer simulation.

Authors:  Maurits K Konings
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Increasing the oscillation frequency of strong magnetic fields above 101 kHz significantly raises peripheral nerve excitation thresholds.

Authors:  Irving N Weinberg; Pavel Y Stepanov; Stanley T Fricke; Roland Probst; Mario Urdaneta; Daniel Warnow; Howard Sanders; Steven C Glidden; Alan McMillan; Piotr M Starewicz; J Patrick Reilly
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Prediction of peripheral nerve stimulation thresholds of MRI gradient coils using coupled electromagnetic and neurodynamic simulations.

Authors:  Mathias Davids; Bastien Guérin; Axel Vom Endt; Lothar R Schad; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Sensitivity analysis of neurodynamic and electromagnetic simulation parameters for robust prediction of peripheral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Valerie Klein; Mathias Davids; Lawrence L Wald; Lothar R Schad; Bastien Guérin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Gradient and shim technologies for ultra high field MRI.

Authors:  Simone A Winkler; Franz Schmitt; Hermann Landes; Joshua de Bever; Trevor Wade; Andrew Alejski; Brian K Rutt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Optimization of MRI Gradient Coils With Explicit Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Constraints.

Authors:  Mathias Davids; Bastien Guerin; Valerie Klein; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Functionalized anatomical models for EM-neuron Interaction modeling.

Authors:  Esra Neufeld; Antonino Mario Cassará; Hazael Montanaro; Niels Kuster; Wolfgang Kainz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Optimizing selective stimulation of peripheral nerves with arrays of coils or surface electrodes using a linear peripheral nerve stimulation metric.

Authors:  Mathias Davids; Bastien Guérin; Valerie Klein; Martin Schmelz; Lothar R Schad; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.