Literature DB >> 22538160

New Criteria for Assessing the Accuracy of Blood Glucose Monitors meeting, October 28, 2011.

John Walsh1, Ruth Roberts, Robert A Vigersky, Frank Schwartz.   

Abstract

Glucose meters (GMs) are routinely used for self-monitoring of blood glucose by patients and for point-of-care glucose monitoring by health care providers in outpatient and inpatient settings. Although widely assumed to be accurate, numerous reports of inaccuracies with resulting morbidity and mortality have been noted. Insulin dosing errors based on inaccurate GMs are most critical. On October 28, 2011, the Diabetes Technology Society invited 45 diabetes technology clinicians who were attending the 2011 Diabetes Technology Meeting to participate in a closed-door meeting entitled New Criteria for Assessing the Accuracy of Blood Glucose Monitors. This report reflects the opinions of most of the attendees of that meeting. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the public, and several medical societies are currently in dialogue to establish a new standard for GM accuracy. This update to the FDA standard is driven by improved meter accuracy, technological advances (pumps, bolus calculators, continuous glucose monitors, and insulin pens), reports of hospital and outpatient deaths, consumer complaints about inaccuracy, and research studies showing that several approved GMs failed to meet FDA or International Organization for Standardization standards in postapproval testing. These circumstances mandate a set of new GM standards that appropriately match the GMs' analytical accuracy to the clinical accuracy required for their intended use, as well as ensuring their ongoing accuracy following approval. The attendees of the New Criteria for Assessing the Accuracy of Blood Glucose Monitors meeting proposed a graduated standard and other methods to improve GM performance, which are discussed in this meeting report.
© 2012 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22538160      PMCID: PMC3380793          DOI: 10.1177/193229681200600236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  21 in total

1.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Tight glucose control in the intensive care unit: are glucose meters up to the task?

Authors:  Mitchell G Scott; David E Bruns; James C Boyd; David B Sacks
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Standardized evaluation of nine instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  Gunn B B Kristensen; Grete Monsen; Svein Skeie; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Evaluation of a new blood glucose monitoring system with auto-calibration for home and hospital bedside use.

Authors:  Charles Kilo; William T Dickey; Judy O Joynes; Mary B Pinson; John M Baum; Joan L Parkes; Donald R Parker
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 5.602

5.  Consensus statement on self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Variability among five over-the-counter blood glucose monitors.

Authors:  Mary M Kimberly; Hubert W Vesper; Samuel P Caudill; Steven F Ethridge; Enada Archibold; Kimberly H Porter; Gary L Myers
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 3.786

7.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose. American Diabetes Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  David B Sacks; David E Bruns; David E Goldstein; Noel K Maclaren; Jay M McDonald; Marian Parrott
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Evaluation of a new blood glucose monitoring system with auto-calibration.

Authors:  Charles Kilo; Mary Pinson; Judy Ostrom Joynes; Hal Joseph; Nanette Monhaut; Joan Lee Parkes; John Baum
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the analytical performance of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose: concepts of performance evaluation and definition of metrological key terms.

Authors:  Oliver Schnell; Rolf Hinzmann; Bernd Kulzer; Guido Freckmann; Michael Erbach; Volker Lodwig; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-01

2.  System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Christina Schmid; Annette Baumstark; Stefan Pleus; Manuela Link; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01

3.  Analytical performance of glucose monitoring systems at different blood glucose ranges and analysis of outliers in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Christoph Hasslacher; Felix Kulozik; Isabel Platten
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-02-18

Review 4.  Point-of-care blood glucose testing for diabetes care in hospitalized patients: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Rajesh Rajendran; Gerry Rayman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-05

5.  Accuracy Evaluation of CONTOUR(®)PLUS Compared With Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.

Authors:  Nancy Dunne; Maria T Viggiani; Scott Pardo; Cynthia Robinson; Joan Lee Parkes
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.945

6.  Patient-based quality control for glucometers: using the moving sum of positive patient results and moving average.

Authors:  Chun Yee Lim; Tony Badrick; Tze Ping Loh
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

7.  Analyse Accuracy of Glucose Monitors without any Dedicated Software Package.

Authors:  Himel Mondal; Shaikat Mondal
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-08-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.