Literature DB >> 22538154

Accuracy of point-of-care glucose measurements.

Annette Rebel1, Mark A Rice, Brenda G Fahy.   

Abstract

Control of blood glucose (BG) in an acceptable range is a major therapy target for diabetes patients in both the hospital and outpatient environments. This review focuses on the state of point-of-care (POC) glucose monitoring and the accuracy of the measurement devices. The accuracy of the POC glucose monitor depends on device methodology and other factors, including sample source and collection and patient characteristics. Patient parameters capable of influencing measurements include variations in pH, blood oxygen, hematocrit, changes in microcirculation, and vasopressor therapy. These elements alone or when combined can significantly impact BG measurement accuracy with POC glucose monitoring devices (POCGMDs). In general, currently available POCGMDs exhibit the greatest accuracy within the range of physiological glucose levels but become less reliable at the lower and higher ranges of BG levels. This issue raises serious safety concerns and the importance of understanding the limitations of POCGMDs. This review will discuss potential interferences and shortcomings of the current POCGMDs and stress when these may impact the reliability of POCGMDs for clinical decision-making.
© 2012 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22538154      PMCID: PMC3380786          DOI: 10.1177/193229681200600228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  77 in total

1.  Assessing point-of-care hemoglobin measurement: be careful we don't bias with bias.

Authors:  Timothy E Morey; Nikolaus Gravenstein; Mark J Rice
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Intravenous fluids cause systemic bias in a conductivity-based point-of-care hematocrit meter.

Authors:  Patrick Wu; Timothy E Morey; Neil S Harris; Nikolaus Gravenstein; Mark J Rice
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Dynamic electrochemistry: a step in the right direction.

Authors:  Mark J Rice
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-01

Review 4.  Technologies for continuous glucose monitoring: current problems and future promises.

Authors:  Santhisagar Vaddiraju; Diane J Burgess; Ioannis Tomazos; Faquir C Jain; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

5.  Performance of seven blood glucose testing systems at high altitude.

Authors:  B P Giordano; W Thrash; L Hollenbaugh; W P Dube; C Hodges; A Swain; C R Banion; G J Klingensmith
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.140

6.  Disinfectant wipes containing hydrogen peroxide induce overestimation of glucose results obtained with Lifescan SureStep Flexx® glucose meter.

Authors:  Philippe Desmeules; Johanne Ethier; Pierre Allard
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.281

7.  Dynamic electrochemistry corrects for hematocrit interference on blood glucose determinations with patient self-measurement devices.

Authors:  Petra B Musholt; Christina Schipper; Nicole Thomé; Sanja Ramljak; Marc Schmidt; Thomas Forst; Andreas Pfützner
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-01

8.  Fingerstick glucose determination in shock.

Authors:  S H Atkin; A Dasmahapatra; M A Jaker; M I Chorost; S Reddy
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Glucose meter performance criteria for tight glycemic control estimated by simulation modeling.

Authors:  Brad S Karon; James C Boyd; George G Klee
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Automated near-continuous glucose monitoring measured in plasma using mid-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Thomas Jax; Tim Heise; Leszek Nosek; Jennifer Gable; Gene Lim; Christopher Calentine
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-01
View more
  38 in total

1.  Impact of High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C for Treatment of Sepsis on Point-of-Care Blood Glucose Readings.

Authors:  Anna Peyton Howell; Jenna L Parrett; Daniel R Malcom
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-25

Review 2.  Challenges of inpatient blood glucose monitoring: standards, methods, and devices to measure blood glucose.

Authors:  Kathie L Hermayer; Aundrea S Loftley; Sumana Reddy; Satya Nandana Narla; Nina A Epps; Yusheng Zhu
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  Analytic evaluation of a new glucose meter system in 15 different critical care settings.

Authors:  John V Mitsios; Lori A Ashby; Doris M Haverstick; David E Bruns; Mitchell G Scott
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

4.  Analysis: New point-of-care blood glucose monitoring system for the hospital demonstrates satisfactory analytical accuracy using blood from critically ill patients--an important step toward improved blood glucose control in the hospital.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Joseph
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

5.  Utility of point-of-care vs reference laboratory testing for the evaluation of glucose levels.

Authors:  O M Andriankaja; F J Muñoz-Torres; J L Vergara; C M Pérez; K Joshipura
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 6.  Blood Ketones: Measurement, Interpretation, Limitations, and Utility in the Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

Authors:  Ketan Dhatariya
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2017-02-10

7.  Analytical Evaluation of the Xpress and Hospital Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.

Authors:  Maria Kapusta; Krystyna Slowinska-Solnica; Jan Skupien; Bogdan Solnica
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-21

8.  A Simulation Study to Assess the Effect of Analytic Error on Neonatal Glucose Measurements Using the Canadian Pediatric Society Position Statement Action Thresholds.

Authors:  Mark Inman; Kayla Parker; Lannae Strueby; Andrew W Lyon; Martha E Lyon
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-06

9.  Type 1 Diabetes - A Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Lindy Kahanovitz; Patrick M Sluss; Steven J Russell
Journal:  Point Care       Date:  2017-03

10.  Comparative Accuracy of 17 Point-of-Care Glucose Meters.

Authors:  Laya Ekhlaspour; Debbie Mondesir; Norman Lautsch; Courtney Balliro; Mallory Hillard; Kendra Magyar; Laura Goergen Radocchia; Aryan Esmaeili; Manasi Sinha; Steven J Russell
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.