Literature DB >> 30710457

Utility of point-of-care vs reference laboratory testing for the evaluation of glucose levels.

O M Andriankaja1, F J Muñoz-Torres1, J L Vergara1, C M Pérez2, K Joshipura1,3.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the level of agreement between point-of-care and laboratory reference glucose values in defining glycaemic status.
METHODS: We analysed 1292 overweight/obese, non-institutionalized participants, aged 40-65 years, in the San Juan Overweight Adults Longitudinal Study. Fasting venous blood glucose was determined using a point-of-care Bayer Contour Blood Glucose Meter and by Vitros System 250 instrument (laboratory). American Diabetes Association thresholds were used to classify participants into normoglycaemia (< 5.6 mmol/l), prediabetes (5.6 to 6.9 mmol/l), or diabetes groups (≥ 7 mmol/l).
RESULTS: Bland-Altman plot analysis showed a slope of 0.04 (P=0.002) for the regression between the mean difference and the average of the two methods. The slopes were significantly different from zero among people with normoglycaemia (β=-0.57, P<0.001), and prediabetes (β=-0.75, P<0.001) but not among people with diabetes (β=-0.02, P=0.68). When the prediabetes and diabetes groups were merged into one group, the slope was 0.01, and the glucose values remained similar using the two methods (P=0.76).
CONCLUSION: Point-of-care blood glucose measurement may be useful to screen people with diabetes, and to assess glucose among individuals with diabetes where blood can be drawn, but laboratory tests are unavailable or untimely.
© 2019 Diabetes UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30710457      PMCID: PMC6599708          DOI: 10.1111/dme.13922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  32 in total

1.  System accuracy evaluation of systems for point-of-care testing of blood glucose: a comparison of a patient-use system with six professional-use systems.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Christina Schmid; Stefan Pleus; Annette Baumstark; Manuela Link; Erhard Stolberg; Cornelia Haug; Jochen Sieber
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  The variability of results between point-of-care testing glucose meters and the central laboratory analyzer.

Authors:  Adil I Khan; Yolanda Vasquez; Jacquelyn Gray; Frank H Wians; Martin H Kroll
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 3.  Accuracy of point-of-care glucose measurements.

Authors:  Annette Rebel; Mark A Rice; Brenda G Fahy
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

4.  The effect of haematocrit on reagent strip tests for glucose.

Authors:  K Wiener
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1991 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 4.359

5.  Blood glucose: its measurement and clinical importance.

Authors:  V Marks
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 6.  Point-of-care testing for diabetes.

Authors:  Deirdre R Blake; David M Nathan
Journal:  Crit Care Nurs Q       Date:  2004 Apr-Jun

7.  Performance Evaluation of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using ISO 15197: 2013 Accuracy Criteria, Consensus and Surveillance Error Grid Analyses, and Insulin Dosing Error Modeling in a Hospital Setting.

Authors:  José Luis Bedini; Jane F Wallace; Scott Pardo; Thorsten Petruschke
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-10-07

8.  A Potential Issue with Screening Prediabetes or Diabetes Using Serum Glucose: A Delay in Diagnosis.

Authors:  Jun Goo Kang; Cheol-Young Park; Sung-Hee Ihm; Sung Woo Park
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 5.376

9.  IG20/MADD plays a critical role in glucose-induced insulin secretion.

Authors:  Liang-cheng Li; Yong Wang; Ryan Carr; Christine Samir Haddad; Ze Li; Lixia Qian; Jose Oberholzer; Ajay V Maker; Qian Wang; Bellur S Prabhakar
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 10.  Risk factors contributing to type 2 diabetes and recent advances in the treatment and prevention.

Authors:  Yanling Wu; Yanping Ding; Yoshimasa Tanaka; Wen Zhang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.