Literature DB >> 22511851

Representations for phonotactic learning in infancy.

Kyle E Chambers1, Kristine H Onishi, Cynthia Fisher.   

Abstract

Infants rapidly learn novel phonotactic constraints from brief listening experience. Four experiments explored the nature of the representations underlying this learning. 16.5- and 10.5-month-old infants heard training syllables in which particular consonants were restricted to particular syllable positions (first-order constraints) or to syllable positions depending on the identity of the adjacent vowel (second-order constraints). Later, in a headturn listening-preference task, infants were presented with new syllables that either followed the experimental constraints or violated them. Infants at both ages learned first- and second-order constraints on consonant position (Experiments 1 and 2) but found second-order constraints more difficult to learn (Experiment 2). Infants also spontaneously generalized first-order constraints to syllables containing a new, transfer vowel; they did so whether the transfer vowel was similar to the familiarization vowels (Experiment 3), or dissimilar from them (Experiment 4). These findings suggest that infants recruit representations of individuated segments during phonological learning. Furthermore, like adults, they represent phonological sequences in a flexible manner that allows them to detect patterns at multiple levels of phonological analysis.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22511851      PMCID: PMC3326355          DOI: 10.1080/15475441.2011.580447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Learn Dev        ISSN: 1547-3341


  17 in total

1.  Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience.

Authors:  Kristine H Onishi; Kyle E Chambers; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-02

2.  Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: the role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing.

Authors:  Luca L Bonatti; Marcela Peña; Marina Nespor; Jacques Mehler
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-06

3.  Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints.

Authors:  Jill A Warker; Gary S Dell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Lexical inhibition and sublexical facilitation are surprisingly long lasting.

Authors:  Meghan Sumner; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Effects of Attention on the Strength of Lexical Influences on Speech Perception: Behavioral Experiments and Computational Mechanisms.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; James L McClelland; Lori L Holt; James S Magnuson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-03

6.  Young infants' retention of information about bisyllabic utterances.

Authors:  P W Jusczyk; A M Jusczyk; L J Kennedy; T Schomberg; N Koenig
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  J F Houde; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The role of talker-specific information in word segmentation by infants.

Authors:  D M Houston; P W Jusczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Pattern induction by infant language learners.

Authors:  Jenny R Saffran; Erik D Thiessen
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2003-05

10.  Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception.

Authors:  A D Friederici; J M Wessels
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-09
View more
  9 in total

1.  Finding patterns and learning words: Infant phonotactic knowledge is associated with vocabulary size.

Authors:  Katharine Graf Estes; Stephanie Chen-Wu Gluck; Kevin J Grimm
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-02-22

2.  Phonological Learning Influences Label-Object Mapping in Toddlers.

Authors:  Ellen Breen; Ron Pomper; Jenny Saffran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Learning to speak by listening: Transfer of phonotactics from perception to production.

Authors:  Audrey K Kittredge; Gary S Dell
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  A vowel is a vowel: generalizing newly learned phonotactic constraints to new contexts.

Authors:  Kyle E Chambers; Kristine H Onishi; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Novel phonotactic learning: Tracking syllable-position and co-occurrence constraints.

Authors:  Amélie Bernard
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  An onset is an onset: Evidence from abstraction of newly-learned phonotactic constraints.

Authors:  Amélie Bernard
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Infant learning is influenced by local spurious generalizations.

Authors:  LouAnn Gerken; Carolyn Quam
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2016-04-07

8.  Two for the price of one: Concurrent learning of words and phonotactic regularities from continuous speech.

Authors:  Viridiana L Benitez; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Impact of associative word learning on phonotactic processing in 6-month-old infants: A combined EEG and fNIRS study.

Authors:  Hellmuth Obrig; Julia Mock; Franziska Stephan; Maria Richter; Micol Vignotto; Sonja Rossi
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 6.464

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.