Literature DB >> 27061339

Infant learning is influenced by local spurious generalizations.

LouAnn Gerken1, Carolyn Quam1.   

Abstract

In previous work, 11-month-old infants were able to learn rules about the relation of the consonants in CVCV words from just four examples. The rules involved phonetic feature relations (same voicing or same place of articulation), and infants' learning was impeded when pairs of words allowed alternative possible generalizations (e.g. two words both contained the specific consonants p and t). Experiment 1 asked whether a small number of such spurious generalizations found in a randomly ordered list of 24 different words would also impede learning. It did - infants showed no sign of learning the rule. To ask whether it was the overall set of words or their order that prevented learning, Experiment 2 reordered the words to avoid local spurious generalizations. Infants showed robust learning. Infants thus appear to entertain spurious generalizations based on small, local subsets of stimuli. The results support a characterization of infants as incremental rather than batch learners.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27061339      PMCID: PMC5055404          DOI: 10.1111/desc.12410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  12 in total

Review 1.  What's in a look?

Authors:  Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2007-01

2.  iMinerva: a mathematical model of distributional statistical learning.

Authors:  Erik D Thiessen; Philip I Pavlik
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-11-05

3.  A rational account of pedagogical reasoning: teaching by, and learning from, examples.

Authors:  Patrick Shafto; Noah D Goodman; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A first step in form-based category abstraction by 12-month-old infants.

Authors:  Rebecca L Gómez; Laura Lakusta
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2004-11

5.  Modeling cross-situational word-referent learning: prior questions.

Authors:  Chen Yu; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Representations for phonotactic learning in infancy.

Authors:  Kyle E Chambers; Kristine H Onishi; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2011-10-12

7.  Pattern induction by infant language learners.

Authors:  Jenny R Saffran; Erik D Thiessen
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2003-05

8.  Twelve-month-old infants benefit from prior experience in statistical learning.

Authors:  Jill Lany; Rebecca L Gómez
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-12

9.  Learn locally, act globally: learning language from variation set cues.

Authors:  Luca Onnis; Heidi R Waterfall; Shimon Edelman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-11-18

10.  Surprise! Infants consider possible bases of generalization for a single input example.

Authors:  LouAnn Gerken; Colin Dawson; Razanne Chatila; Josh Tenenbaum
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-04-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  A little labeling goes a long way: Semi-supervised learning in infancy.

Authors:  Alexander LaTourrette; Sandra R Waxman
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2018-09-18

2.  Not All Procedural Learning Tasks Are Difficult for Adults With Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  LouAnn Gerken; Elena Plante; Lisa Goffman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.297

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.